Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
0 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Crawford & Company (CRD.A) is a global claims-management and outsourcing provider to insurers, brokers and corporations, reporting $1.293 billion of revenue in 2024 across four segments (North America Loss Adjusting, International Operations, Broadspire, and Platform Solutions). The business is highly service‑and‑volume driven, with operations spanning field adjusters, TPAs, contractor networks and catastrophe teams across 70+ countries and ~10,040 employees. Revenue and margins are sensitive to case volumes, weather/catastrophe activity, client outsourcing decisions and FX, and the company currently carries modest liquidity (cash ~$55–58M, available liquidity ~$273–278M) and leverage (~1.85x at year‑end).
Executive pay at Crawford is likely structured around short‑term cash incentives and longer‑term equity tied to operating performance metrics that reflect the firm’s business drivers — e.g., adjusted EBITDA, segment operating earnings, utilization rates, new client wins and margin improvement — because management repeatedly cites pricing, utilization and segment margins as primary performance levers. The MD&A notes compensation as a material operating cost (costs of services and SG&A rose partly from higher compensation), and management explicitly flags incentive‑compensation timing (H1 cash outflows), suggesting annual bonus calendars that concentrate cash payouts early in the year. Other program features to watch: equity grants/RSUs to align long‑term retention across a geographically dispersed workforce, performance‑based earnouts tied to acquisitions (contingent consideration fair‑value adjustments), and pension plan costs/funding (funded deficit ~$21.1M) that can influence total executive pay and cash planning. Given the company’s sensitivity to case mix, catastrophe cycles and FX, compensation scorecards likely include non‑GAAP adjustments and multi‑year goals to smooth weather‑driven volatility.
Insider trading in Crawford should be interpreted in the context of highly event‑sensitive revenue (catastrophes, large client wins/losses, FX movements, and pension/tax events). Expect regular blackout periods around quarterly earnings, major catastrophe responses, material client contract news and M&A earnout milestones; look for pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans to explain scheduled sales following large bonus or equity vesting events (notably H1 when incentive payouts and pension payments typically peak). Because material clients can be segment‑level revenue drivers and because revenue recognition (lifetime claims deferrals ~$39.6M) and contingent consideration can materially affect reported results, insider activity around disclosures of major client changes, guidance updates or tax/regulatory items (e.g., foreign tax guidance) may warrant extra scrutiny. Finally, given the company’s debt facility and covenant sensitivity, insider trades that coincide with covenant risk, liquidity events or large bonus/vesting dates should be monitored for timing patterns that reflect compensation cashing‑out behavior rather than opportunistic information advantage.