Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
29 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Cantaloupe, Inc. is a global technology provider for self-service commerce that sells hardware (card readers, self‑checkout kiosks, POS/handhelds), a cloud software suite (Seed platform and APIs), and integrated payment processing. For FY2025 the company reported $303M in revenue, driven largely by transaction fees (total dollar transaction volume $3.44B), with 1.28M active devices and ~34.9k active customers across the U.S., U.K., EU, Australia and Mexico. The business model emphasizes recurring subscription and processing fees (transaction volume is the primary revenue driver), device deployments and cross-sell within verticals such as vending, micro‑markets and stadiums. On June 15, 2025 Cantaloupe agreed to an all‑cash acquisition by 365 Retail Markets expected to close in H2 2025, after which it will cease to be a public company.
Compensation is likely tied to metrics that drive recurring and high‑margin revenue—transaction volume, active devices/customers, subscription ARR, and gross margin/Adjusted EBITDA—given management’s emphasis on growing transaction and subscription revenue and improving unit economics. As a technology/payments provider, typical pay packages will combine base salary, annual cash incentives linked to short‑term operational KPIs (revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, device rollouts) and equity awards (RSUs/options) to align long‑term retention and product/market execution. Recent M&A activity (Cheq, SB Software) and the pending change‑in‑control transaction make retention awards, deal‑related bonuses and potential accelerated vesting important elements to monitor; management’s focus on cash flow and liquidity may also shift weighting between cash bonuses and equity. Intellectual property, regulatory approvals, and integration milestones (e.g., international expansion, payment‑processor relationships) are additional performance levers that can appear in LTIP scorecards.
Because the company is transaction‑driven, insiders tend to monitor and may time trades around public releases of transaction volume, device growth, and major customer or partnership announcements—these metrics can move sentiment and short‑term price action. The announced all‑cash merger creates special considerations: change‑in‑control protections, potential accelerated vesting, and likely blackout periods or deal‑related trading restrictions; insiders may also file or rely on 10b5‑1 plans to execute trades ahead of delisting. Regulatory realities for payment companies (merchant‑acquirer relationships, processor approvals, and supply‑chain disruptions for hardware) can produce material disclosures that affect insider activity; interim credit facility covenants and merger conditions may further restrict or influence timing of insider sales. For traders and researchers, watch filings disclosing option exercises, equity vesting acceleration, 10b5‑1 plans, and any Schedule 13D/G or Form 4s around earnings, material integration milestones, and the H2 2025 closing window.