Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
149 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is a Virginia‑based aerospace & defense prime contractor with four principal reporting segments: Mission Systems, Defense Systems, Aeronautics Systems and Space Systems. In Q2 2025 the company reported $10.35 billion in sales (organic +2%), a $1.43 billion operating income benefitting from a $231 million pre‑tax gain on the May divestiture of its Immersive Mission Solutions training business, and diluted EPS of $8.15; year‑to‑date results were weighed down by a $477 million loss provision on the B‑21 LRIP program. Backlog was $89.7 billion (down ~2%), Q2 net awards totaled $7.4 billion, cash was $1.9 billion, and the company reported negative free cash flow YTD driven by working capital timing and program provisions. Management flags program execution (notably B‑21 and Sentinel), award timing, DoD budget uncertainty, supply chain and labor pressures, and acquisition reforms as principal near‑term risks that can materially affect margins and cash flow.
Compensation at an aerospace & defense prime like Northrop Grumman is likely weighted toward performance‑linked pay: annual cash bonuses and long‑term equity (RSUs and performance shares) tied to company financials (operating income, EPS, free cash flow), backlog/net awards, and program‑level execution metrics (cost‑to‑complete/EAC adjustments and milestone delivery). Company‑specific drivers this year include remediation of the B‑21 LRIP loss estimate (which can suppress annual bonus payouts or cause performance share vesting failures) versus one‑time improvements such as divestiture gains and favorable Sentinel EAC adjustments that can boost incentive payouts or trigger equity vesting under discretion. Retention incentives and special awards are common to hold cleared engineering and production personnel through long program ramps; issuance of debt and negative FCF can also shift board focus toward cash conservation and may temper cash‑bonus funding or accelerate reliance on equity. Compensation governance will also reflect heightened regulatory and contract compliance expectations (clawback policies, ethics and export/ITAR compliance metrics) given the company’s classified programs and DoD counterparty.
Insider trading at NOC will often cluster around material, predictable events — major contract awards, significant EAC updates (e.g., B‑21 or Sentinel), quarterly earnings, divestiture announcements, and DoD budget decisions — all of which can move the stock and affect whether insiders buy or sell. Because executives have access to program‑sensitive and potentially classified information, trading windows, mandatory pre‑clearance and blackout periods are tight; look for use of Rule 10b5‑1 plans for scheduled diversification sales, and scrutinize Form 4 filings around divestiture proceeds, senior note issuance, or post‑earnings volatility. Short‑term insider purchases may signal confidence when the market punishes near‑term cash flow or program provisions, while clustered sales after positive one‑time gains (divestiture) or stock rallies can indicate routine diversification rather than informational trading. Finally, regulatory constraints tied to government contracting, export controls and security clearances increase the likelihood of conservative, well‑documented trading practices and slower, more structured insider activity.