Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
32 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Radiant Logistics is a non-asset-based third‑party logistics (3PL) that arranges multimodal freight (air, ocean, TL, LTL, intermodal) and provides customs, materials management & distribution (MM&D) and global trade management services across the U.S. and Canada. The company operates a multi‑brand network of ~100 operating locations (company‑owned and strategic partners), emphasizes carrier neutrality and low capital intensity, and is migrating to a centralized SAP transportation/financial platform while leveraging a proprietary GTM system. Fiscal 2025 revenue reached $902.7M with adjusted EBITDA of $38.8M and compressed gross margins due to lower‑margin ocean and project charter volumes; cash from operations weakened and acquisition activity remains a key growth lever. Radiant’s business and financials are sensitive to trade volumes, seasonality, partner conversions, acquisition earn‑outs, and regulatory regimes (FAA/TSA, FMCSA, FMC, CBP).
Given Radiant’s business model and the MD&A emphasis, executive pay is likely weighted toward performance metrics tied to adjusted EBITDA, adjusted gross profit (and margin), successful acquisition integration (earn‑outs and synergies), and cash‑flow/covenant compliance rather than asset returns. Short‑term incentive pay will typically track revenue growth, EBITDA and project/charter wins, while long‑term equity awards (RSUs, performance shares or options) are often conditioned on multi‑year adjusted EBITDA/TSR, margin recovery and successful SAP/technology rollouts. Compensation committees in the Industrials / Integrated Freight & Logistics sector commonly add deal‑related retention awards to keep acquired management and align partner conversion outcomes with pay, and may incorporate risk‑adjusters to account for contingent consideration volatility and non‑cash amortization. Expect disclosure of targets and use of non‑GAAP metrics (adjusted EBITDA, adjusted gross profit %) because these are central to covenants and investor guidance.
Key information asymmetries that can drive insider trades include M&A activity and earn‑out/contingent consideration estimates (Level‑3 valuations), the timing and size of project charter bookings, partner‑to‑company conversions (which materially change commission expense), and SAP/technology migration milestones that affect productivity. Because adjusted EBITDA is a lender/investor covenant and a primary compensation metric, insiders may be especially sensitive to quarterly covenant outcomes and liquidity signals (cash, revolver usage), so Form 4 activity around quarter‑ends and deal announcements merits attention. Regulatory or customs/transport enforcement actions, port disruptions, or large charter contracts can cause rapid re‑rating; therefore traders should monitor 10‑Ks/10‑Qs, acquisition disclosures, and Section 16 filings, and also watch for management use of blackout windows and 10b5‑1 plans that indicate routine vs. opportunistic trading.