Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
41 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
United States Antimony Corporation is a small-cap, vertically integrated processor and seller of antimony products, a precious‑metals recovery processor, and a zeolite miner/processor operating in the Basic Materials sector (Other Industrial Metals & Mining). Its operations include a permitted U.S. antimony smelter and Montana processing plant, two Mexican smelters (USAMSA), and the Bear River Zeolite operation in Idaho; recent activity includes acquisitions of claims in Alaska and Ontario and a leased concentration plant in Philipsburg, MT. The company’s 2024 revenue mix was heavily weighted to antimony ($11.1M of $14.94M total), with rapid year‑over‑year recovery in pricing and volumes driving improved margins and cash, while Q2 2025 showed extremely strong antimony realized prices and meaningful inventory build. Key business dependencies—concentrated customers, largely foreign ore supply (contracted through 2025), commodity price volatility, permitting/liability obligations, and limited IP—inform both operational and financial outcomes.
At a firm this size and commodity focus, compensation is likely tied to short‑ and medium‑term production and price metrics: pounds of antimony sold, realized price per pound, gross margin/EBITDA, safety/permitting compliance, and successful resource or acquisition milestones (drilling, geophysics, permitted expansion). Management already disclosed increased non‑cash equity compensation and higher board fees in 2024, consistent with small‑cap miners that lean on equity‑based pay (stock, options, RSUs, performance shares) when cash is constrained; long‑term incentives are commonly tied to reserve/resource growth, production ramp targets, and M&A/exploration outcomes. Given the company’s recent equity raises, warrants, ATM activity and tenuous short‑term liquidity, expect continued use of equity and performance vesting to conserve cash—which increases dilution risk for shareholders and aligns insiders’ pay with commodity/operational performance.
Material insider trading triggers are likely to cluster around commodity‑price shocks, drilling or resource updates (BRZ technical report, Alaska/Ontario drilling), ore‑supply contract renewals or Mexican smelter operational notices (shutdowns/restarts), inventory swings and quarterly financials revealing margin shifts. Watch for patterns of insider warrant exercises, subsequent share sales, or increased option grants around financing events (ATM placements, warrant exercises, Treasury Strip collateralized LOC) since management has used equity financing recently; such activity can create short‑term selling pressure or signal cash needs. Regulatory and cross‑border risks (MSHA/OSHA, U.S. reclamation, SEMARNAT/PROFEPA in Mexico) can produce sudden material disclosures that trigger blackouts—insider filings should be monitored closely for 10b5‑1 plans, timing relative to public announcements, and clustered trades ahead of resource or permitting news.