Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
31 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Upexi is a dual-business company combining a long-only Solana (SOL) digital-asset treasury with ownership, manufacturing and distribution of consumer brands (LuckyTail, PRAX, Cure Mushrooms, Moonwlkr, Gumi Labs) focused on wellness, pet care and cannabinoid products. Since early 2025 the company has reallocated a large portion of its balance sheet into SOL (roughly $253 million held with BitGo at reported prices) and currently stakes about 95% of its holdings to generate yield, while operating end-to-end manufacturing and DTC/distribution from facilities in Florida. Recent financials show a materially restructured revenue base (revenue down 43% as recommerce was divested) and a mix of staking revenue plus product margins, with G&A up 76% driven in part by higher corporate compensation and public-company costs. Key operational risks are SOL price volatility, validator/custody concentration, regulatory oversight of digital assets and product-specific regulation (FDA/FTC/USDA for hemp/CBD).
Compensation appears increasingly tied to both corporate and treasury outcomes: management disclosed materially higher corporate compensation as G&A rose, and future pay programs are likely to incorporate digital-asset treasury performance (SOL price movements, staking revenue, slashing/validator performance) alongside traditional operating metrics (gross margin, inventory turnover, DTC growth and working capital). Given aggressive capital raises, convertible instruments, warrants (including those issued to asset manager GSR) and public-company transition costs, long-term incentives are likely to include equity, options and warrants—and may increasingly contemplate crypto-linked metrics or NAV-based bonus gates to align pay with treasury returns. The company’s reliance on an external asset manager with fees and warrant economics creates a structural drag on net treasury returns that could influence target-setting and payout outcomes for executives. Regulatory uncertainty around digital assets and product categories suggests boards may build compliance- and risk-mitigation vesting conditions (e.g., clawbacks, blackout periods or hedging prohibitions) into executive packages.
Insider trading patterns at Upexi may reflect two distinct exposures: equity/warrant/convertible economics tied to the corporate business and direct sensitivity to SOL price and staking announcements; look for clustering of insider activity around fundraising events, private placements, convertible issuances and staking revenue disclosures. Concentration of custodial holdings (BitGo primary) and relatively limited custodial insurance elevate the materiality of adverse custody or slashing events, which could prompt rapid market reactions and increase the likelihood of pre- or post-event insider sales or hedging (subject to policy). Monitor filings for insider participation in capital raises, transfers related to warrants or option exercises, and any related-party arrangements (e.g., asset-manager warrants to GSR) that change potential insider dilution or incentives. Finally, evolving federal/state crypto regulation and product-specific oversight (CBD/hemp) can create formal blackout windows, additional disclosure obligations and heightened enforcement risk that may constrain or change timing of insider transactions.