Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
98 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. is an externally managed mortgage REIT that originates, holds and manages middle‑market CRE mortgage loans and select equity investments, with a portfolio weighted toward multifamily (≈77%) and concentration in Texas, Arizona and Florida. At year‑end 2024 the firm managed about $1.9 billion of assets (loan portfolio carrying value ≈ $1.5 billion) and targets floating‑rate whole loans and junior capital structures with typical loan sizes of $10–$100 million and short original terms (up to three years). The company relies on securitizations, warehouse facilities and a large JPMorgan term reinvestment facility for funding, has largely completed LIBOR-to‑SOFR transition, and maintains hedges or reserves on roughly 75% of par to mitigate interest‑rate risk. Recent dynamics include portfolio runoff/paydowns, higher CECL reserves (≈2.2% of portfolio), paused common distributions and active liquidity management.
Because ACRES Commercial is externally managed by ACRES Capital, LLC and has no direct employees, executive compensation is determined by the manager under a formal Management Agreement rather than an in‑house payroll; the agreement includes a 1.50% annual base management fee on equity (paid monthly) plus performance‑based incentive fees payable in cash and common stock. That structure means pay is directly linked to assets under management, equity base and the realization of performance triggers (which can align manager incentives with book‑value growth, distributable earnings and securitization outcomes) but also can create principal‑agent tensions if fee mechanics reward growth in fee‑bearing equity even when distributable cash is constrained. Key measurable drivers for pay will be net interest margin/spread (weighted‑average spread ~3.73%, coupon ~8.3%), originations and portfolio size, credit metrics/CECL provisioning, securitization/access to funding and book value per share growth (management cited book value gains as a focus). The payment of incentive fees partly in common stock can reduce cash strain and better align long‑term outcomes, but also dilutes common shareholders and may influence timing of repurchases or distribution policy.
Insiders and manager personnel likely trade under typical public‑company constraints (Form 4 reporting, blackout windows and pre‑clearance), but trading patterns will be influenced by transaction‑driven liquidity events (securitization closes/redemptions, loan payoffs, foreclosures-to‑real‑estate conversions and property sales) and the limited runway for material tax attributes (notably $121.9M capital loss carryforwards expiring end‑2025), which could create windows where insiders possess material nonpublic information. Because compensation and fees are tied to AUM and performance, insiders aligned with the external manager may be more likely to trade around announced share repurchases or distribution policy changes; conversely, insider purchases during dividend suspensions and repurchase programs can signal management confidence. The company’s reliance on covenanted warehouse/securitization financing and changing CECL assumptions means material credit or covenant developments can rapidly change outlook—investors should watch Form 4s near securitization actions, large foreclosures/conversions and quarterly CECL disclosures and assume strict blackout policies around those events. Regulatory constraints linked to maintaining REIT and Investment Company Act exclusions (asset tests, distribution rules) also shape management decisions and therefore the timing of insider transactions.