Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
206 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Arteris Inc. is a California‑based technology company in the Semiconductors industry that supplies IP and software used in system‑on‑chip (SoC) designs, with demand driven by increasing SoC complexity and AI workloads. In Q2 2025 revenue was $16.5M (up 13% Y/Y) and trailing ACV, ACV+royalties, and Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) all increased materially, while gross margins stayed very high (~89–90%). The company is scaling headcount—particularly FAEs, engineers and sales—to capture design wins, which has pushed R&D and S&M spend higher and increased stock‑based compensation. Management expects continued investment to drive longer‑term royalty streams but notes semiconductor cyclicality, export controls and long license‑to‑royalty lags (1–5 years) as important risks.
Compensation at Arteris is likely equity‑heavy and oriented toward long‑term incentives, because stock‑based compensation is already a material driver of operating expense as the company scales headcount. Performance and retention metrics that matter for pay will likely include ACV growth, confirmed design starts, royalty run‑rate/royalties-in‑payment, revenue growth, gross margin and ultimately cash generation or profitable scalability. Given the multi‑year revenue realization cycle from license to royalties, the company will tend to use multi‑year vesting schedules or performance‑based RSUs to align executives with long‑horizon design wins and recurring royalty streams. Shorter‑term bonuses may be tied to bookings or milestone licensing events (new license arrangements, material design starts) and retention pay for field application engineers and sales staff is likely important in this capital‑light but talent‑intensive business.
Because material value is created over long, multi‑year design and royalty cycles, insider transactions should be interpreted in context: buys around increasing ACV/RPO or a cluster of confirmed design starts can be a bullish signal, while sales often reflect scheduled vesting, diversification or financing expectations rather than negative information. Regulatory and geopolitical factors—especially U.S. export controls affecting China—can create discrete material events that would justify insider blackout periods and heighten the market impact of any Form 4 filings. Watch for increased insider selling following equity grants or ahead of potential financings (management flagged possible future capital raises), and check for pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans and Section 16 reporting timing to distinguish routine, planned sales from opportunistic trades.