Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
62 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Aspen Aerogels designs, develops and manufactures high‑performance aerogel materials sold principally into two segments: Energy Industrial insulation (Pyrogel, Cryogel, Spaceloft) and EV/energy‑storage thermal barriers (PyroThin), and is also developing carbon aerogel battery materials. The company achieved a step‑change in 2024 driven by rapid PyroThin adoption (2024 revenue $452.7M; PyroThin $306.8M) and expanded gross margin to ~40%, but remains highly concentrated (one major U.S. OEM/GM accounted for ~64% of 2024 revenue and top 10 customers ~84%). Operations are vertically integrated around proprietary manufacturing in East Providence plus contract manufacturing in China and a Mexico maquiladora; key risks include long OEM qualification cycles (1–3 years), raw‑material cost volatility, and capacity scaling constraints. Management’s recent guidance and Q2 2025 results show meaningful cyclicality and downside risk from OEM step‑downs, impairments (Statesboro), and customer order variability.
Given the company’s commercial profile, executive pay is likely weighted toward variable compensation tied to commercial milestones (OEM qualification and production ramps), financial metrics (revenue growth, gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA) and long‑term value creation through IP and manufacturing scale. The filings explicitly call out Adjusted EBITDA as a non‑GAAP performance measure and identify stock‑based compensation valuation as a critical accounting area, implying significant use of equity awards (RSUs/options/performance shares) that can materially affect reported earnings and executive pay expense. R&D progress, patent portfolio expansion and successful cost reductions or capacity projects (East Providence conversion, Mexico maquiladora) are logical performance levers for long‑term incentives, while annual bonuses will likely reflect near‑term volume/price and margin outcomes. Because the company has had large swings in GAAP profitability (loss in 2023 to net income in 2024 then material impairment in 2025), compensation plans may include threshold/target/superior payouts and clawback or discretionary adjustment language to address one‑time items and restructuring events.
Insiders’ trade timing and volume should be monitored around OEM qualification announcements, production ramp milestones, quarterly results (volumes/pricing), capacity/capex updates and material financing actions (convertible note repurchase, MidCap loan draws/amendments), since these events drive large earnings and valuation moves for Aspen. High revenue concentration and cliff‑like vesting of equity awards can produce clustered insider sales following positive PyroThin adoption news, while negative developments (impairments, step‑down pricing, weaker OEM orders) can trigger opportunistic insider buys or forced sales for diversification/liquidity. Regulatory and contractual constraints to watch include Section 16 reporting (Form 4), typical blackout/pre‑clearance policies and the potential for trading restrictions tied to debt covenants or change‑of‑control provisions (Section 382 NOL use limits after financings). Finally, because management emphasizes non‑GAAP metrics and equity awards, researchers should watch for large option/RSU vesting dates and any disclosed 10b5‑1 trading plans that can explain otherwise unusual insider activity.