Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
134 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Avista Corp. (AVA) is a vertically integrated, rate‑regulated electric and natural gas utility serving eastern Washington, northern Idaho, parts of Oregon and Montana (Avista Utilities) and the sole electric utility in Juneau, Alaska (AEL&P). Its 2024 footprint included ~422k electric and ~383k gas customers (plus ~17.8k in Juneau) and an electric resource mix heavily weighted to hydro (~44%) and thermal (~43%), supplemented by PPAs, market purchases and growing wind/solar/RNG contracts. Avista operates under a cost‑of‑service ratemaking model overseen by multiple state commissions (WA, ID, OR, MT) and federal bodies (FERC, NERC), is executing a multi‑year capex program (~$525M–$600M annual range) for reliability, wildfire resiliency and clean energy goals, and faces material risks from hydro variability, commodity volatility and regulatory outcomes (Colstrip transition, IRPs, rate cases).
Compensation at a regulated utility like Avista is typically tied to stable base pay plus short‑ and long‑term incentives that emphasize regulated financial metrics (utility margins, allowed ROE, regulatory outcomes), operational reliability and safety, and execution of capital programs. Given Avista’s recent MD&A emphasis—rate case wins that materially lifted electric and gas margins, large near‑term capex and IRP execution—annual bonuses and performance awards are likely calibrated to achievement of approved rate recovery, margin targets, timely capital project delivery, safety/wildfire resiliency milestones and progress toward clean‑energy IRP targets. The company’s defined benefit/pension obligations and ongoing pension contributions also factor into total executive compensation and long‑term retention design; equity awards (RSUs/performance shares) and deferred compensation are common in utilities to align executives with long‑dated regulatory and asset lives. Compensation committees at utilities also build in protections for regulatory prudence reviews and may include clawback or adjustment provisions tied to adverse regulatory findings or material restatements.
Insider trading at Avista will be closely tied to the timing of regulatory and resource events that materially change forward earnings expectations—key windows include rate case decisions in WA/ID/OR, the Colstrip transfer/adjudication (notably Oct. 3, 2025 hearing), IRP/RFP award announcements (RFP selections Q3/Q4 2025), and major contract or capital‑markets actions (planned equity issuance ~$80M, debt issuances). Material nonpublic information such as expected allowed returns, prudence rulings, RFP outcomes or significant hydro/commodity developments creates standard blackout triggers; executives commonly use pre‑arranged Rule 10b5‑1 plans to diversify holdings around predictable vesting/exercise events. For market participants, monitor Form 4/144 filings around known vesting dates, capital raises, and regulatory milestones—large or unusually timed sales by insiders could signal confidence/concern about upcoming rate recoveries, capex funding needs, or commodity exposure. Finally, sector regulation (state commission prudence reviews, FERC/NERC reliability rules) increases both the likelihood of disclosure-driven trading suspensions and the scrutiny of trades around sensitive regulatory filings.