Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
63 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Avidia Bancorp, Inc. is a Massachusetts-based regional bank (Banks - Regional) with $2.96 billion in total assets at June 30, 2025. Recent results show improving quarterly profitability (Q2 net income $3.9M vs. $2.4M a year ago) driven by wider net interest margin (3.19%) and higher loan yields, supported by meaningful balance-sheet growth after IPO proceeds boosted cash/securities and core deposits. Year-to-date results were adversely affected by a large provision for credit losses (including a Q1 $16.7M land‑loan charge‑off), and management flags key near‑term risks including credit quality volatility, interest‑rate risk, deposit composition and operational/cyber exposures.
Compensation for senior executives is likely to be tied to traditional banking KPI’s emphasized in the MD&A: net interest income and net interest margin, loan growth and deposit retention, credit quality (provision expense and ACL levels), efficiency (expense control) and capital ratios. The IPO liquidity event creates scope for equity‑based long‑term incentives (RSUs, options) and retention awards to align executives with stock performance and capital preservation; you can also expect short‑term cash bonuses linked to quarterly/annual NII and fee income targets. Management already disclosed slightly higher compensation in Q2 (linked to new online banking platform costs), so pay plans may include metrics for digital adoption and fee income, and will likely incorporate regulatory risk‑adjustment or clawback clauses common in banking.
Insider activity at Avidia will be influenced by the recent IPO (increased float and liquidity) and any lock‑up expirations, which can enable larger insider sales once permitted; conversely, improved margins and deposit momentum create buy‑signals for insiders. Credit events (large provisions or charge‑offs) and interest‑rate sensitivity pose event risks that often trigger clustered insider trades around quarterly releases, making Form 4 filings around earnings and credit disclosures especially informative. As a regulated bank, insiders are subject to Section 16 reporting, likely internal blackout windows, common bank policies prohibiting hedging or pledging of unvested equity, and frequent use of 10b5‑1 plans — all of which should be checked when interpreting transaction timing and intent.