Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
112 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
American States Water Company (AWR) is a California‑based regulated utility holding company that provides retail water and electric distribution (through Golden State Water Company and Bear Valley Electric Service) and long‑term contracted water/wastewater operations for U.S. military installations via American States Utility Services (ASUS). At year‑end 2024 AWR served ~289,414 total customers and operates under CPUC regulation for its regulated utilities, while ASUS’s revenue depends on long‑term firm‑fixed‑price government contracts. Recent regulatory outcomes (GSWC 2025–2027 settlement authorizing ~ $573.1M of capex; BVES 2023–2026 settlement) and elevated company‑funded capex guidance ($170–$210M for 2025) drive near‑term strategy and financials, with material risks from CPUC rulings, PFAS/drinking‑water compliance, wildfire mitigation costs and interest‑rate/financing conditions.
Given AWR’s regulated, capital‑intensive model, executive pay is likely calibrated to regulatory and operational outcomes rather than short‑term market swings: key performance metrics that will drive annual and long‑term incentive payouts include successful rate‑case outcomes and authorized return on equity (ROE), execution of large capital programs and on‑time capex delivery, safety and wildfire mitigation performance, environmental/compliance milestones (PFAS/lead remediation), and cash‑flow/credit metrics tied to financing access. Long‑term compensation is typically equity‑oriented (RSUs/options or performance shares) to align executives with rate‑base growth and total shareholder return, while annual cash incentives may reference adjusted EPS, operating cash flow, and regulatory memorandum account recoveries (e.g., PFAS receivable recognition). Pension/benefit plan outcomes and the presence of unionized workforces at some operations can affect O&M cost trends and thus incentive payouts; CPUC scrutiny of utility costs and customer rates also increases public sensitivity around pay levels and dividend maintenance expectations.
Insiders at AWR will often trade around discrete, material regulatory and contract events that move valuation: CPUC rate decisions, settlement approvals (e.g., GSWC and BVES outcomes), material PFAS settlements/receivables, major capex financings or ATM equity issuances (AWR raised ~$89.5M via ATM in 2024 and had ~ $82.9M available mid‑2025), and significant ASUS contract awards/modifications. Expect formal blackout periods and pre‑clearance policies tied to earnings releases and material regulatory filings, and frequent use of Rule 10b5‑1 plans to manage routine sales given predictable dilution trends and a history of ATM activity. Because executive incentives are linked to regulatory recoveries and capex execution, insiders may be more likely to monetize holdings after favorable rate rulings or financings; conversely, government‑contract concentration at ASUS creates event‑driven insider sensitivity when contract performance or renewals are uncertain. Regulatory reporting (Form 4s) and public/regulatory stakeholder attention mean trades can attract scrutiny, particularly if perceived as timed around customer rate impacts.