Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
80 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Peabody Energy is a leading global producer of metallurgical and thermal coal, operating 17 active mines in the U.S. and Australia and producing ~118.1 million tons in 2024. The company sells primarily under long‑term supply agreements (≈90% of volumes by tonnage in 2024) but has shorter seaborne contract duration and greater price exposure in international markets; backlog was ~153 million tons (1–7 year contracts) as of Jan 1, 2025. Recent strategic items shaping near‑term operations and cash needs include the proposed Anglo metallurgical acquisition (bridge financing $2.075B), Centurion longwall development (longwall production target Q1 2026), and significant reclamation bonding obligations (~$1.2B combined collateral). Financial performance is cyclical and was weaker through 2024–Q2 2025 (Adjusted EBITDA down materially year‑over‑year), increasing sensitivity to commodity prices, transport constraints, permitting and regulatory shifts.
Given Peabody’s business model, executive pay is likely weighted to short‑run commodity and operating metrics (realized price/ton, tons sold, Adjusted EBITDA, cash generation) and key project milestones (Centurion longwall ramp, successful close/financing of the Anglo acquisition). Industry norms in Basic Materials/Thermal Coal favor a mix of base salary, annual cash incentives tied to safety and EBITDA/cash flow targets, and long‑term equity (RSUs/PSUs) with performance metrics such as TSR, reserve life, impairment thresholds and production/volume-based goals; retention or transaction‑related awards are common for large acquisitions. Because reclamation bonds, asset retirement obligations and impairment risk materially affect reported results and balance‑sheet flexibility, compensation committees often incorporate sustainability/safety metrics and downside protection (clawbacks, negative discretion) and may use non‑GAAP measures like Adjusted EBITDA to set short‑term payouts.
Insider activity at Peabody will likely cluster around discrete, high‑information events: quarterly earnings and guidance (given volatile seaborne prices), updates on the Anglo acquisition and bridge financing, Centurion construction/production milestones, regulatory/permit decisions, and material reserve/impairment announcements. Sellers may be interpreted as signaling concerns about liquidity needs (reclamation collateral, bridge financing cost) or downside commodity outlook, while insider purchases around financing/close milestones would be a stronger signal of conviction; traders should watch timing relative to blackout windows, covenant tests and material adverse change (MAC) developments. Cross‑jurisdictional rules (U.S. SEC and Australian insider trading regimes), typical company blackout periods, and the use of pre‑arranged trading plans (Rule 10b5‑1 or equivalent) are important controls to screen for when assessing whether reported insider trades reflect opportunistic timing or pre‑planned dispositions.