Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
15 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. develops purpose-built AI edge-to-core computing solutions that combine proprietary silicon (the Graph Streaming Processor family delivered as compute cards) with a low-code/no-code software stack (Blaize AI Studio) targeting vision analytics across short-cycle industrial markets (surveillance, machine vision, drones, robotics, defense) and longer-cycle automotive programs. The business model is hardware-plus-software and ecosystem-driven, with go-to-market emphasis on OEM qualification, system integrators, ISVs and value-added resellers to embed Blaize compute into edge boxes, industrial PCs and automotive platforms. The company is R&D-intensive (majority engineers), protects IP via issued and pending patents, and faces material dependencies on semiconductor foundries, OEM qualification cycles and evolving AI/privacy/export controls. Blaize completed a reverse merger (effective Jan 13, 2025) and raised PIPE capital, but management disclosed substantial doubt about near-term liquidity absent successful conversion of POCs/design wins and additional financing.
Given the company’s cash-constrained, R&D-heavy profile and transition to a public company, compensation is likely skewed toward equity and milestone-based awards to conserve cash — the filings explicitly show substantial increases in stock-based compensation after the business combination. Short- and mid-term incentive metrics that will matter to pay design include hardware shipments and software revenue ramps, conversion rates of POCs to design wins/OEM qualifications, and specific engineering milestones (e.g., SoC tapeouts or automotive validations). Long-term equity grants and retention awards are likely used to keep technical talent (many engineers) through long OEM qualification cycles; those awards may vest on product, revenue or partnership milestones rather than pure time-based schedules. Finally, reported non‑cash volatility from fair‑value remeasurement of derivatives and convertibles can materially swing GAAP results and thus complicate any GAAP‑based bonus or clawback provisions.
Insider activity should be evaluated in the context of post-merger lock-ups, PIPE resale restrictions, and sponsor advances/related-party interests disclosed in the filings — look for concentrated insider or sponsor sales following expiration of lock-ups or to cover option/RSU tax withholding. Because executive pay is equity-heavy, expect Form 4s showing option exercises and subsequent sales (to fund taxes or diversify) rather than frequent open-market purchases; purchases by insiders would be a stronger signal of conviction given the company’s capital uncertainty. Material commercial milestones (POC conversions, design wins, major partner orders such as the Starshine commitment), OEM qualifications, earnings/financing announcements and any CFIUS/export-control developments are likely to drive informative insider trades and should be watched closely for timing around Form 4 filings. Finally, the high level of non‑cash accounting volatility (warrants, convertible notes, earnouts) and ongoing financing needs increase the risk of opportunistic insider selling; check for 10b5‑1 plans, pre-clearance statements and blackout windows in proxy/insider disclosures.