Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
38 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. is a residential homebuilder operating across multiple U.S. markets; in Q3 FY2025 the company reported softer demand (homebuilding revenue down 9.2% to $535.4M, closings down 11.3% to 1,035 homes) with net new orders falling 19.5% and backlog units down 30.6% year‑over‑year. Average selling price rose modestly (Q3 ASP $517.3k, +2.4% YoY) but gross margin compressed to 13.5% from 17.3% due to impairments, higher incentives and a mix shift toward lower‑margin spec homes. Management has emphasized capital discipline: slowing land spend, expanding lot option agreements (60.1% of active lots under option), pursuing deleveraging and book‑value growth while retaining repurchase authority (586k shares bought for $12.5M in Q3 under a $100M program). Key near‑term risks are mortgage rate volatility, affordability pressures, localized market weakness (Houston, San Antonio, Orlando) and potential credit rating stress.
Given Beazer’s operating profile and management commentary, incentive pay is likely tied to volume and margin metrics (closings, net orders, backlog conversion) as well as profitability measures (Adjusted EBITDA, GAAP income) and balance‑sheet goals (net debt‑to‑capitalization, book value per share). Recent margin compression, impairments and a stated goal to grow book value per share and deleverage suggest management will emphasize longer‑term equity awards (RSUs or performance shares) that vest on multi‑year book‑value, return or credit‑quality targets rather than short‑term revenue metrics. Share repurchases to support book value and offset dilution are an active capital‑allocation tool and may interact with equity compensation (e.g., repurchases to neutralize option/RSU dilution). Because discrete items (impairments, tax‑credit changes) materially affect GAAP results, compensation plans may rely more on adjusted or non‑GAAP performance measures to avoid outsized payout volatility.
Insiders may be especially active around signals of valuation vs. book value — management already executed repurchases while the stock traded below book — so Form 4 activity (open market buys or sales) and new buyback announcements are high‑information events. Material, company‑specific drivers of insider trading risk include disclosure of backlog or order trends, land impairment or option decisions, and the financial impact of the OBBBA tax‑credit repeal; these are likely to create trading windows and blackout periods around earnings and major land transactions. Credit‑related developments (S&P outlook changes, covenant pressure) and liquidity updates are also likely catalysts for insider trades and 10b5‑1 plan activity, so monitor filings for planned transactions and any insider exercise/sales that coincide with repurchase programs. Finally, standard SEC/Regulation FD and industry practice mean insiders will generally avoid trades when in possession of material nonpublic information and may use pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans to execute otherwise sensitive transactions.