Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
16 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
CION Investment Corporation is an externally managed, closed-end Business Development Company (BDC) that primarily originates and acquires senior-secured debt of U.S. middle-market companies, concentrating in first-lien and unitranche loans (~86% of portfolio fair value) with modest equity (~13%). Managed and administered by CIM (with operational support from AIM/Apollo), the firm carries meaningful leverage (consolidated indebtedness ≈ $1.12B at 12/31/2024) and a floating-rate book (~79% floating as of mid‑2025), driving sensitivity to interest-rate moves and financing costs. The portfolio is relatively concentrated (roughly 99–105 companies, fair value ~$1.8B) and includes illiquid Level 3 holdings, creating valuation subjectivity that influences reported earnings and NAV volatility. Management has used share repurchases and maintains discretion over distributions to satisfy RIC rules while managing liquidity and upcoming maturities.
Because CION is externally managed, most economic compensation is paid to CIM under a contractual management structure rather than to company employees; the base management fee is 1.5% of gross assets (reducible to 1.0% under certain leverage conditions) and incentive fees include an income-based hurdle plus a capital gains sharing element. That fee model means manager economics rise with asset growth and, to a lesser extent, with leverage—so metrics like gross assets, portfolio yield, deployed leverage/asset coverage and realized/unrealized gains are primary compensation drivers. Transaction fees, origination economics and portfolio workout results (realized losses/gains and mark-to-market adjustments) also materially affect incentive fee calculation and alignment. Board oversight and the exemptive order for conditional co-investments are governance levers that can mitigate conflicts between feeed manager incentives and shareholder outcomes.
Insiders most likely to trade are directors, affiliated manager employees and other related parties (including co-investment partners), not traditional in-house executives, so watch Forms 4 for trades by CIM/AIM/Apollo personnel and board members. Trading may cluster around discrete credit events, valuation resets (Level 3 marks), distribution declarations, refinancing milestones (notably the Feb 2026 note maturity) and repurchase program announcements (repurchase capacity recently increased), since those items affect NAV and anticipated cash flows. Regulatory constraints under the Investment Company Act and RIC distribution rules, plus the company’s exemptive-order conditions for related-party deals, increase the likelihood of formal blackout windows and require careful disclosure of affiliated transactions—insiders trading near material nonpublic credit or liquidity information could raise compliance risk. Finally, monitor 10b5-1 plans and company repurchases (ongoing 10b5-1 repurchases) to separate management-driven repurchases from opportunistic insider buys or sells.