Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
13 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Cohen & Company is a boutique specialty financial services firm organized across Capital Markets, Asset Management and Principal Investing, with $2.3B AUM (≈41–42% in legacy CDOs) and significant fixed‑income and SPAC-related activities. Its Capital Markets arm (U.S. broker‑dealer JVB and European CCFESA) focuses on niche credit products, mortgage/TBA financing, underwriting and a boutique investment‑banking/advisory unit (CCM) that often receives securities as fee consideration. The firm is highly regulated (SEC/FINRA in the U.S.; ACPR/AMF and EU regimes in Europe) and is operationally sensitive to repo financing, counterparty concentration, interest‑rate/mortgage volumes and SPAC market cycles.
Compensation is likely strongly performance‑sensitive and deal‑driven: management disclosed incentive pay rose materially with the recent surge in CCM advisory fees and improved principal results, and overall compensation tends to track net trading, new‑issue/advisory fees and asset‑management fee runoff. Because CCM frequently receives securities as part of fees and the Principal Investing segment takes direct stakes (including SPAC sponsor/post‑combination positions), a component of executive pay can be non‑cash/illiquid and exposed to fair‑value (Level‑3) volatility. Retention and recruiting of key professionals is a clear priority given the boutique model, so short‑term bonuses, deal carry and equity‑style awards (or securities received as compensation) are likely important levers; this creates episodic large payouts tied to lumpy deal flows rather than stable salary increases.
Insider trading activity at Cohen should be interpreted in light of several company‑specific features: executives often receive securities as deal compensation and hold SPAC/post‑combination equity that is illiquid and fair‑value volatile, so insider sales may reflect portfolio rebalancing or Rule 144/lockup timing rather than only a view on fundamentals. The firm’s broker‑dealer net capital requirements and concentrated repo/resale exposures mean insiders may be constrained from distributions during tight capital periods, so spikes in Form 4 sales after regulatory capital improvements, CDO contract sales or debt refinancings are meaningful signals. Also expect ordinary restrictions common to the sector — Section 16 short‑swing rules, FINRA/SEC disclosure and typical quiet‑period/underwriting blackout windows — and watch for the use of 10b5‑1 plans by insiders managing timing risk for illiquid or large non‑cash awards.