Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
67 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Cooper‑Standard is a global automotive supplier that designs and manufactures sealing systems and fluid‑handling systems for passenger cars and light trucks, serving major OEMs (≈86% of 2024 sales) and appearing on over 430 vehicle nameplates. The company operates ~124 facilities in 20 countries across two reportable product lines (Sealing Systems and Fluid Handling) and emphasizes engineering/materials innovation (Fortrex™, FlexiCore™, PlastiCool™, eCoFlow™) and standardized operational savings through its Cooper Standard Operating System. Key business risks and drivers include high OEM concentration, platform life‑cycle timing (5–8 years), commodity/raw‑material volatility, foreign‑exchange exposure, and substantial pension and leverage considerations that affect near‑term cash flow and covenant compliance.
Given the company’s profile, executive pay is likely oriented to operational and cash‑flow metrics rather than GAAP net income—typical measures would include Adjusted EBITDA, gross/segment margins, free cash flow or working capital improvement, and program‑award/launch milestones tied to OEM platforms. Short‑term incentives are expected to reward cost‑out/lean gains (CSOS savings), material purchasing improvements, and margin expansion, while long‑term incentives will lean toward equity (RSUs, performance shares) tied to multi‑year profitability, ROIC or relative TSR to retain engineering talent and align with multi‑year platform cycles. Management disclosures show sizable one‑time pension charges and other non‑operating items, so compensation plans will likely rely on adjusted metrics and explicit exclusions for pension or restructuring items—creating potential pay/performance perception gaps. Finally, leverage and covenant sensitivity mean compensation committees may incorporate liquidity/deleveraging targets or gating provisions that can reduce bonuses or delay equity vesting if credit covenants or cash targets are breached.
Insider trading at Cooper‑Standard will typically be constrained by standard blackout periods around quarter‑end financial reporting, and many executives will use Rule 10b5‑1 plans to schedule trades given the frequent material non‑GAAP adjustments (Adjusted EBITDA, pension settlements) that can change public perceptions. Material events that can drive insider activity include OEM program awards or cancellations, joint‑venture entries in China/India/Thailand, significant commodity or tariff developments, and updates on leverage/covenant status or receivables‑factoring lines—each can be price‑sensitive for a supplier with high OEM concentration. Regulatory and lender considerations (Section 16 reporting, insider awareness of potential covenant breaches, and multinational trade/environmental rules) can further limit opportunistic trading and may delay option exercises or stock issuances if cash conservation or covenant compliance is needed.