Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
0 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Smart Powerr Corp. is a Nevada holding company that provides waste‑to‑energy and energy‑efficiency solutions in China through wholly owned PRC subsidiaries and joint ventures, focusing on onsite waste pressure/heat/gas power systems for heavy industries and transitioning toward integrated energy‑storage solutions. Projects are capital‑intensive, typically sized in the low‑to‑mid tens of megawatts, delivered under EPC partners and commonly financed/operated on a BOT lease model with 5–20 year terms, producing project‑level cash flows and asset transfers at term end. The company operates a very small headcount (14 employees) with operations and maintenance often outsourced, and it carries large receivables/short‑term loan balances (other current assets of roughly $121M) that materially affect its liquidity and reported results. Recent periods reflect business transformation: a 2024 net loss of $1.56M and minimal 2024 cash on hand (later improved to $131.1M as of 6/30/2025) following recoveries of receivables and an equity raise.
Given limited operating cash and the transformation strategy, Smart Powerr has relied increasingly on share‑based compensation to preserve cash: stock‑based compensation was ~$139k in 2024 and rose sharply to ~$831k in the first half of 2025, indicating greater use of equity awards to reward and retain management during the pivot to energy‑storage. Compensation is likely tied to project milestones, contract awards, successful collection of large receivables/entrusted loans, financing/access to capital, and achievement of operational uptime or handover events under the BOT structure — all measurable, project‑level KPIs common in utilities/renewables. As a microcap with outsourced ops and limited in‑house IP, pay packages may emphasize long‑dated equity vesting to align executives with long‑term asset performance and successful asset transfers, while short‑term cash incentives are constrained by the company’s historical operating losses and going‑concern dynamics. Boards and compensation committees should be expected to weigh dilution risk from equity grants against the need to attract technical and financing expertise for the energy‑storage pivot.
Insider trading at Smart Powerr will be sensitive to a few company‑specific catalysts: announcements of receivable recoveries or repayment of entrusted loans, completion of financing or equity raises, awards/vesting of significant stock‑based compensation, and operational restarts at previously idle plants — each can materially shift perceived value given the small float and concentrated balance sheet items. PRC constraints (currency controls, statutory reserves, dividend restrictions), evolving PRC securities/regulatory rules, and U.S. inspection/HFCAA scrutiny can create real windows where insiders are unable to repatriate proceeds or may be contractually restricted from trading, so disclosed insider sales/purchases should be examined for timing relative to regulatory filings and cross‑border liquidity events. Because the company has used equity issuance as a financing tool and granted larger equity awards in 2025, look for Form 4 filings tied to grant vesting schedules, 10b5‑1 plans, or block trades around financing closings; in a microcap, even small insider trades can signal management views on recovery of receivables or confidence in the energy‑storage transition.