Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
40 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Crescent Energy Co. is a U.S. onshore oil & gas E&P concentrated in Texas (notably the Eagle Ford) and the Rocky Mountain region, operating largely as an operator on ~1.3 million net operated acres with a low‑decline, cash‑flow‑focused development plan. At year‑end 2024 Crescent reported ~709.3 MMBoe of proved reserves (~63% liquids), PV‑10 of $6.46 billion, and produced ~201 MBoe/d in 2024; management targets modest reinvestment (~45% of Adjusted EBITDAX historically) and converts PUDs on a multi‑year plan. The company is managed under an agreement with an indirect KKR subsidiary that supplies executive teams and operational support and receives fixed plus performance‑based compensation, and Crescent’s recent growth and cash flow were driven materially by the SilverBow merger and other acquisitions.
Compensation is likely structured to emphasize free cash flow, Adjusted EBITDAX, production and reserve conversion metrics, and safe, disciplined capital returns rather than pure production growth—consistent with management’s stated capital allocation (doubling of Levered Free Cash Flow to $630M in 2024 and 56% Adjusted EBITDAX growth). The Management Agreement with a KKR affiliate creates an important line item: fixed management fees plus performance‑based pay for the Manager, and Crescent discloses manager compensation as a contractual commitment; equity‑based awards have recently been a material driver of G&A (a large year‑over‑year increase). Typical sector levers (realized commodity prices, hedging effectiveness, DD&A/impairment outcomes and integration success on acquisitions) will feed incentive payouts, and board discretion over dividends/repurchases means long‑term pay may also track TSR and return‑of‑capital metrics. Expect vesting schedules, time‑based and performance equity, and deal‑related retention awards tied to merger integration given the recent M&A activity.
Insider activity should be viewed through the prism of heavy Manager (KKR) involvement, recent large acquisitions and refinancing, and commodity‑sensitive operating metrics — insiders affiliated with the Manager or large shareholders may trade in patterns tied to deal milestones, refinancing announcements or commodity price cycles. Material non‑public drivers that commonly precede trading moves include reserve or impairment estimates, production/volume guidance changes, hedging adjustments, and large buyer concentration (Shell/ConocoPhillips ~40% of 2024 revenues), so watch trading around earnings, reserve releases, and M&A disclosures. Regulatory and environmental developments (e.g., IRA methane fees, permitting changes, pipeline constraints) can rapidly change outlooks and create blackout windows; look for 10b5‑1 plans and related‑party disclosure relating to Manager compensation when interpreting trades, and treat post‑merger equity awards and vesting events as likely triggers for insider sells.