Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
169 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Cirrus Logic is a Texas‑based fabless semiconductor company that designs low‑power, high‑precision mixed‑signal solutions for mobile and consumer markets, organized into Audio and High‑Performance Mixed‑Signal (HPMS) product lines. HPMS is the primary growth driver while Audio remains the larger revenue base; the business is highly customer‑concentrated (the ten largest end customers ≈96% of FY2025 sales and Apple ≈89%). The company is R&D‑intensive (≈23% of sales and ~71% of employees in R&D), outsources wafer fabrication to foundries (primarily GlobalFoundries and TSMC) under capacity commitments, and faces short product lifecycles, supply‑chain and foundry risks, and exposure to export controls. Recent results show modest top‑line and margin improvement driven by new product ramps, stronger smartphone content, solid operating cash flow, and active share repurchases.
As a semiconductor design leader, Cirrus likely uses a typical mix of base salary, cash incentives and equity compensation (RSUs/stock options) with a sizeable portion of pay tied to performance and long‑term equity to align engineers and executives with product development cycles. Given the company’s heavy R&D spending, frequent references to stock‑based compensation in filings, and low voluntary turnover, compensation plans are likely structured to reward design wins, time‑to‑market, content per device, and retention of technical talent (multi‑year vesting and performance RSUs are common). Financial metrics that plausibly drive annual bonuses and long‑term awards include revenue (and HPMS growth), gross margin/operating income, free cash flow and successful execution of capacity/reservation agreements and inventory management. The company’s active share repurchase program also influences total shareholder return, so equity‑based pay and buybacks together can materially affect realized executive pay and timing of exercises/sales.
High customer concentration—particularly reliance on Apple—means insiders are likely to possess material nonpublic information tied to customer product cycles, design wins, and shipment rhythms, increasing the risk that trades around product ramps or quarterly results could be information‑sensitive. Operational dependencies (foundry capacity reservations, inventory write‑downs, supply‑chain disruptions) and export‑control exposures can produce sharp news impulses, so market participants should watch for clustered insider transactions before or after related announcements. Because equity compensation appears significant, common insider activity patterns to monitor include option exercises, “sell‑to‑cover” transactions at vesting, and insider sales concurrent with large buyback programs; disclosure via Section 16 filings and any 10b5‑1 plan statements will be key context. Finally, standard regulatory constraints (SEC rules, short‑swing profit rules, and company blackout policies driven by customer confidentiality and export controls) are especially relevant in this sector and can limit or time insider trading.