Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
34 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
DigitalBridge Group is a specialized global investment manager focused on digital infrastructure (data centers, cell towers, fiber, small cells and edge) that sponsors closed‑end funds, co‑invest vehicles and liquid mandates across equity and credit strategies. At year‑end 2024 it reported $35.5 billion of fee‑earning equity under management (FEEUM) and a diversified institutional investor base; FEEUM grew to ~$39.7 billion by mid‑2025 driven by large capital raises for flagship value‑add funds and co‑invests. The firm’s revenue mix is highly fee‑dependent (management fees plus incentive/carried interest and principal investment income) and therefore produces strong recurring fee metrics (Fee‑Related Earnings) but large GAAP volatility driven by unrealized carried interest and valuation timing. Key operational differentiators include securitization/financing expertise, deep customer relationships and an active underwriting/portfolio management process, while meaningful risks are valuation judgement, fundraising cadence, and talent retention.
Compensation is likely structured like other alternative-asset managers: a mix of base salary, cash bonuses, equity‑based awards and economically significant carried interest/GPS economics tied to fund performance. DigitalBridge explicitly earns management fees (roughly 1.6–2.0% on some vehicles), incentive fees and up to ~20% carried interest subject to 6–8% preferred returns and potential clawbacks — so realized carried interest and timing of fund realizations are major drivers of senior pay. Management’s disclosed metrics (FRE growth even as GAAP earnings fell, reduced equity‑based charges in 2024) suggest executives receive both recurring fee‑linked compensation and lumpy, realization‑dependent pay; GP commitments and deferred arrangements are used to align interests and retain talent. Given legal/regulatory exposures (Investment Advisers Act, 1940 Act interpretations, global licensing and compliance), pay programs likely incorporate governance controls, clawback language and deferral features to mitigate regulatory and valuation risk.
Insider trading activity at DigitalBridge will tend to cluster around discrete liquidity events (fund closings, asset sales/secondaries and realizations that trigger carried interest), fundraising milestones and public earnings releases because these drive the largest changes in carried interest recognition and stock volatility. Quarter‑to‑quarter GAAP swings from unrealized allocations (including recent large reversals) make timing important: insiders may be more likely to transact after realized proceeds rather than during periods of large unrealized mark swings. The firm’s compliance program, allocation policies and likely use of pre‑clearance and 10b5‑1 plans (standard at registered investment advisers and REIT/asset‑manager public companies) should limit opportunistic trading; however potential clawback exposure, ongoing preferred dividends and changing liquidity (VFN capacity and corporate cash) can create additional timing pressure for insiders managing personal liquidity. Regulatory considerations (Advisers Act fiduciary duties, Form PF and disclosure trends around valuations/ESG/cyber) increase monitoring and may produce more conservative trading windows and stronger disclosure around related‑party or director trades.