Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
146 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Leonardo DRS Inc. is a mid‑sized defense technology supplier (sector: Industrials; industry: Aerospace & Defense) that designs, develops and manufactures sensing, rugged computing, force‑protection and electric power/propulsion systems for U.S. national security customers and allied governments. It operates two segments—Advanced Sensing & Computing (ASC) and Integrated Mission Systems (IMS)—and serves as both prime (37% of 2024 revenue) and subcontractor (63%), with a backlog of $8.51 billion at year‑end 2024 and 79% of 2024 revenue from the U.S. government (Navy 37%, Army 32%). The business is R&D‑intensive (company‑funded IR&D of $92M in 2024), has substantial fixed‑price production exposure ($2.71B fixed‑price revenue in 2024), and faces concentrated program and supply‑chain risks (e.g., germanium for IR optics) as well as export/procurement controls and a proxy agreement with majority shareholder Leonardo S.p.A.
Compensation at a defense contractor like DRS typically blends base salary, annual cash incentive awards and long‑term equity (time‑vested and performance‑based) tied to financial and programmatic KPIs; at DRS those KPIs are likely to emphasize revenue growth, operating earnings/margins, backlog/bookings conversion and cash generation given the company’s fixed‑price programs and program‑level cost‑to‑cost accounting. Because Columbia Class submarine work and other large programs drive operational leverage, management incentives are likely to include measures of program execution (schedule adherence, EAC accuracy, contract profitability) and risk‑mitigation (supply‑chain resiliency, IR&D milestones). The majority‑shareholder relationship and government contracting environment also push for conservative governance features—say‑on‑pay scrutiny, clawbacks or forfeiture provisions tied to contract audits/terminations, and retention vehicles for technical talent across unionized and non‑union workforces.
Insider trading patterns at DRS should be evaluated against frequent, highly material catalysts: contract awards/terminations, EAC/accounting adjustments, backlog and bookings updates, government appropriations timing and geopolitical developments that affect defense spending. As a government contractor, DRS likely enforces strict pre‑clearance and blackout periods around proposal windows, quarter‑/year‑end financial disclosures and major program milestones; the proxy agreement with Leonardo S.p.A. and Section 16 reporting rules may add additional preclearance or affiliation constraints. Pay attention to sales that coincide with equity vestings, tax withholding needs or share‑repurchase activity versus opportunistic purchases by insiders—buys are relatively more informative given concentrated DoD exposure, limited public float dynamics and the backlog‑driven revenue profile.