Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
90 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Precision BioSciences is a clinical‑stage biotechnology company developing in vivo gene‑editing therapeutics built on its proprietary ARCUS homing endonuclease platform, delivered via AAV and LNP. Lead internally managed programs include PBGENE‑HBV (ELIMINATE‑B Phase 1 underway), PBGENE‑3243 for m.3243 mitochondrial disease (IND/CTA anticipated), and returning programs for Duchenne and other liver/CNS targets; the company also pursues partnered licensing (Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Caribou) and has monetized earlier CAR‑T assets. Operations are research‑intensive (majority of ~108 employees in R&D, many with Ph.D./M.D. degrees), rely on third‑party manufacturing and collaborators, and are highly milestone‑ and regulatory‑driven with material IP and clinical risks. Financial performance and runway are closely tied to milestone/license receipts, collaboration revenue timing, and fair‑value movements from warrants and other instruments.
Given the binary, milestone‑driven nature of value creation (IND filings, DMC clearances, clinical readouts, partner milestones), executive pay is likely skewed toward equity and long‑term incentive awards (options, RSUs) and performance pay tied to clinical and licensing milestones rather than large cash bonuses. Cash conservation pressures (term loan, finite runway, Baby Shelf S‑3 constraints) increase reliance on stock‑based compensation to preserve cash while aligning management to long‑dated regulatory outcomes and IP value; one‑time licensing or asset‑sale proceeds can also trigger special bonuses or milestone payouts. Fair‑value volatility from warrant remeasurements and convertible instruments complicates reported compensation expense and may influence the structuring/timing of equity grants to avoid excessive dilution or accounting hits. Board compensation committees will likely emphasize retention awards for scientific leadership, change‑in‑control protections for key execs in partnership negotiations, and clawback/insider trading policies tied to clinical disclosures.
Insiders at Precision will trade in an environment where a few discrete events (ELIMINATE‑B cohort results, IND/CTA filings for PBGENE‑3243 and DMD, partner milestone recognitions, and licensing receipts) can cause material share‑price moves, so Form 4 activity often clusters around clinical milestone windows and financing announcements. Revenue recognition timing (deferred milestone recognition) and mark‑to‑market volatility from warrants/equity investments have produced lumpy reported results, creating additional short‑term price drivers that can influence insider sale patterns. Regulatory constraints (Section 16 short‑swing rules, blackout windows around clinical disclosures, likely use of 10b5‑1 plans) and lender/security account arrangements tied to the term loan may further shape when executives can sell; researchers and traders should watch 10b5‑1 plan filings, Form 4 timing relative to press releases, and insider option exercises or grant schedules that often precede or follow financings and licensing events.