Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
48 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Everest Group, Ltd. is a Bermuda‑headquartered global reinsurer and specialty insurer that underwrites property & casualty, specialty and financial lines across reinsurance (~71% of GWP) and primary insurance (~28% of GWP), with a Lloyd’s syndicate and operations in >100 countries. At year‑end 2024 the group reported ~$56.3B of assets, $13.9B of shareholders’ equity and $18.2B of gross written premium, and competes on financial strength, broad product breadth and centralized ERM and catastrophe‑modeling capabilities. The company reported weaker underwriting results in 2024 (combined ratio ~102.3%, ~$1.5B unfavorable prior‑year reserve development) offset in part by stronger investment income and continued capital returns (dividends and buybacks). Key operational and regulatory constraints include multi‑jurisdictional statutory surplus limits, reinsurance/retrocession reliance and sensitivity to reserve adequacy, catastrophe seasonality and social inflation in long‑tail casualty lines.
Given Everest’s business model, executive pay will be driven heavily by underwriting performance metrics (combined ratio, loss & LAE development, underwriting income), multi‑year reserve adequacy outcomes, investment returns, and capital metrics such as book value per share and return on equity. Expect a mix of annual cash incentives tied to underwriting and underwriting‑adj. earnings or combined‑ratio targets, plus multi‑year equity‑based awards (RSUs, performance shares or options) that vest against multi‑year ROE, book‑value growth and relative TSR to smooth payouts across volatile catastrophe/claim cycles. Compensation committees at rated, multi‑jurisdictional insurers typically include deferral, clawback provisions and performance measurement windows that account for prior‑year reserve development and regulatory/rating agency capital targets. Retention awards and market‑based pay are also common to retain underwriting talent and analytics staff critical to Everest’s proprietary modeling capability.
Insider trading activity at Everest is likely to cluster around a few predictable catalysts: reserve‑strengthening disclosures and prior‑year development, material catastrophe loss updates, quarterly earnings releases, and announcements of buyback/dividend programs — each can materially move market perceptions of capital adequacy and future incentive payouts. Because Everest is NYSE‑listed and operates under Bermuda and multiple local regulatory regimes, insiders will be subject to SEC insider‑trading rules, typical blackout windows, and use of 10b5‑1 trading plans; statutory surplus limits and intercompany dividend restrictions can also affect how management signals confidence via share repurchases versus cash dividends. Watch for insider buying after headline reserve‑driven selloffs (a signal of management confidence in long‑term value) and for opportunistic sales following grant vestings or dividend declarations (which may be routine tax/diversification activity rather than negative signals). Finally, large or frequent insider trades concurrent with changes in catastrophe exposure, reserve estimates, or rating‑relevant capital metrics warrant closer scrutiny given their direct link to compensation outcomes.