Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
179 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Erie Indemnity Company acts as attorney‑in‑fact and centralized manager for the Erie Insurance Exchange, providing policy issuance/renewal services, claims handling, investment management and shared back‑office functions; its sole customer is the Exchange and its primary revenue is a board‑set management fee (capped at 25%) calculated on the Exchange’s direct and affiliated premiums. In 2024 the Exchange wrote $11.9 billion of premiums, producing $2.894 billion of management fees for Indemnity; operating income and net income were up materially year‑over‑year as premium growth and higher average premiums per policy drove fee revenue. The business model concentrates risk in the Exchange relationship (receivables from the Exchange were ~$707M or ~24.5% of assets at year‑end 2024), is highly regulated by state insurance departments, and is sensitive to underwriting loss trends, rating agency actions (A+ with a negative outlook), seasonality (Q2/Q3 renewals) and episodic events such as the June 2025 cyber incident that temporarily depressed new business.
Compensation for Indemnity executives is likely tied to management‑fee driven financial metrics such as premium growth, policies in force, average premium per policy, operating income and EPS, since fee revenue scales directly with the Exchange’s premium volume and pricing actions. Because the board annually sets the management fee after evaluating operating results, capital needs and ratings, pay programs likely include short‑term incentives keyed to fee and operating results and longer‑term awards that emphasize capital management, investment returns and stability of agency relationships (to protect the fee base). Other pay levers may reflect expense control (commission and policy issuance cost metrics), risk‑adjusted performance (given the Exchange concentration and regulatory scrutiny), and pension/investment assumptions; the company’s move to de‑risk investments and sensitivity to solvency metrics makes capital‑preservation objectives important in long‑term award design.
Insiders’ trading patterns at Indemnity are likely to cluster around discrete, company‑specific catalysts: quarterly earnings and management‑fee disclosures (which track Exchange premium trends), the spring/summer renewal season (Q2/Q3), rate‑filing outcomes and material regulatory approvals or rating‑outlook changes. The concentration of receivables from the Exchange, material related‑party arrangements, and episodic events (e.g., the June 2025 cyber incident) increase the chance of material non‑public information, so traders should watch Form 4 filings and Section 16 reporting closely and expect strict internal blackout windows and pre‑clearance policies; executives may also use 10b5‑1 plans to manage diversification given heavy pay exposure to fee‑linked performance. State insurance regulatory oversight of related‑party fees and capital distributions (dividends/repurchases) can constrain management actions that would affect both compensation payouts and the timing/size of insider trades, so regulatory filings and A.M. Best commentary are valuable signals.