Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
65 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Energy Recovery, Inc. designs and manufactures pressure-exchanger-based energy recovery systems (PX family, hydraulic turbochargers and pumps) primarily for seawater reverse osmosis desalination and expanding into brackish desalination, wastewater (including ZLD/MLD) and CO2-based refrigeration. The company is vertically integrated with R&D and ceramic manufacturing in California and sells globally via three channels—megaprojects (MPD), OEM and aftermarket—with ~99% of revenue from international markets and a highly lumpy MPD-driven revenue profile. Management emphasizes computational fluid dynamics, materials/ceramics IP protection, and formal sustainability targets (65% Scope 1 & 2 GHG intensity reduction by 2026). Recent operational focus includes a completed restructuring to lower headcount and deliberate investments in sales and water-segment capabilities.
Pay at Energy Recovery is likely tied to a mix of base salary, annual incentives and material equity-based long‑term incentives given the company’s heavy use of stock‑based compensation (a visible component of operating expenses and valued using Black–Scholes). Performance metrics that will plausibly drive bonuses and LTI vesting include MPD order awards and on‑time shipment/delivery (backlog conversion), gross margin / manufacturing cost control, operating cash flow and free cash generation, and progress against sustainability/efficiency targets. The company’s lumpy, long‑lead megaproject model and revenue recognition judgments mean compensation committees will favor multi‑year performance horizons and retention-focused awards to keep engineering and ceramics talent. Active share‑repurchase programs (large repurchases in 2024–2025) also interact with equity compensation by offsetting dilution and can affect the timing and sizing of grants.
Insider trading activity should be evaluated in light of highly lumpy, milestone‑driven information flow: contract awards, MPD shipment schedules, LC utilizations and recognition of long‑term contract revenue are frequently material and can precede sharp moves in reported results. Watch for exercises and sales around buyback programs (large repurchases reduce float and often coincide with management confidence) and for the use of Rule 10b5‑1 plans to lawfully time trades; Form 4 filings will reflect any such timing. The firm’s revenue recognition judgments, receivable concentrations and reliance on a few geographies increase the risk that nonpublic project developments move the stock materially, so customary blackout periods around quarter close and material project milestones are especially relevant. Finally, because stock‑based comp is a material accounting judgment, insiders exercising equity (and subsequent stock sales) can be driven by tax planning or diversification rather than a view on fundamentals—so distinguish opportunistic sales from purchases, which more often signal management conviction.