Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
84 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
EVgo is a leading U.S. owner/operator of high‑power DC fast charging (DCFC) networks, providing retail pay‑as‑you‑go charging, subscription offerings, dedicated fleet and rideshare solutions, white‑label site development (eXtend) and software/data services (including PlugShare). As of year‑end 2024 the public network exceeded ~1,100 locations and >3,400 DCFC stalls across 40+ states and delivered the equivalent of >860 million electric miles, with major growth supported by a DOE‑guaranteed loan facility and OEM agreements (notably GM). The business model requires disciplined capital allocation and active management of utility tariffs, demand charges, renewable procurement and uptime obligations; material dependencies include concentrated equipment supply from Delta and receivable concentration with a few large customers. Management emphasizes non‑GAAP operational metrics (adjusted EBITDA, charging‑network gross margin) to show operating leverage as it scales stalls and throughput.
Given EVgo’s stage and operating model, executive pay is likely weighted toward long‑term, equity‑based incentives and performance awards that reward growth in installed stalls, network throughput (GWh), retail and OEM revenue, and charging‑network gross margin/adjusted EBITDA improvements. Cash bonuses and short‑term incentives are apt to be tied to milestone‑based KPIs (stalls installed/commissioned, uptime/service‑level targets, OEM enrollments, and successful draws or compliance under the DOE loan), while long‑term RSUs/PSUs support retention and alignment with multi‑year rollout economics. Because management calls out non‑GAAP metrics and volatile non‑cash items (warrant/earnout revaluations, impairments), bonus plans may exclude certain GAAP swings and instead rely on adjusted results—raising the importance of clear disclosure and possible reconciliation terms. Compensation programs may also include clawback/change‑of‑control language given the Tax Receivable Agreement, loan collateralization and potential accelerated obligations that can materially affect free cash flow.
Material, company‑specific events that create trading sensitivity include DOE loan advances or conditions, OEM contract milestones (e.g., GM stall targets), grant or incentive approvals, supply‑chain shocks (Delta equipment issues), and LCFS/credit price moves that materially affect revenues. Because management highlights adjusted metrics and milestone progress, insider trades around earnings releases or program updates (stalls installed, throughput growth, DOE advances) are especially informative—watch for 10b5‑1 plans and scheduled grants/sales following vesting. Regulatory and contractual constraints (loan and contributed‑stall collateral, milestone‑based liquidated damages, disclosure obligations tied to change‑of‑control/TRA) increase the likelihood of blackout windows and contractual trading restrictions; researchers should monitor filings for any trading plans, forfeiture/clawback provisions, and the timing of insider sales relative to announced operational milestones.