Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
499 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is a California‑based analytics and decision‑management software company whose revenue mix is dominated by its Scores business (Q2 revenue $324.3M, +34% YoY) and a growing Software/SaaS & Platform segment (Q2 $212.1M; ARR $739.1M, +4% YoY). The company reported strong YTD performance (nine‑month revenue $1.475B, +17% YTD) with expanding margins and operating income ($262.5M for the quarter) driven by higher‑margin Scores sales, while also investing in R&D, data center costs and headcount. Management has materially increased leverage via $1.5B of 6.00% senior notes (total debt ~$2.8B) and has been an active buyer of stock (share repurchases $511.3M in the quarter, $878.1M YTD under a $1.0B program). Revenue and cash flow remain sensitive to mortgage origination volumes, customer usage patterns, contract timing and regulatory/tax changes.
Given FICO’s business mix, executives are likely evaluated on revenue growth in Scores, ARR growth and dollar‑based net retention (DBNR ≈103%), operating margin/EBIT and free cash flow conversion — metrics emphasized in the MD&A and that drive both short‑term cash bonuses and long‑term incentives. The combination of high‑margin Scores sales and recurring SaaS economics suggests remuneration will include performance equity tied to ARR/net retention, adjusted operating income or EPS, and time‑vested RSUs to align with long‑term model improvements and product renewals. The recent surge in buybacks and leverage increases the probability that compensation committees will incorporate capital‑structure or leverage-related targets (debt ratios, interest coverage) and may favor equity grants that boost EPS per share through share count reduction. Regulatory sensitivity around credit scoring and data privacy also makes clawback provisions, conduct-based caps and compliance‑linked pay components more likely for senior officers.
FICO insiders operate in an environment where material signals (quarterly ARR trends, large renewals, mortgage origination exposure, and model/regulatory developments) can move the stock, so trades around earnings, major contract renewals, or debt/financing events warrant scrutiny. Heavy and ongoing share repurchases reduce float, so even modest insider sales or purchases can have outsized signaling effects; conversely, insider buys during a repurchase program may be viewed as a stronger confidence signal. Expect insiders to rely on 10b5‑1 plans and standard blackout periods around earnings and material disclosures; given the company’s regulatory footprint, trades that precede adverse regulatory news or material model changes could attract heightened SEC and market attention. Researchers and traders should cross‑check Section 16 filings against repurchase activity, debt announcements, and mortgage/usage data to distinguish routine diversification from information‑driven transactions.