Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
37 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
FIVE STAR BANCORP (FSBC) is a California-based regional bank focused on commercial lending and deposit funding, with total assets of $4.413 billion and total loans of $3.758 billion as of June 30, 2025. Recent results show materially higher net interest income (+25.5% Q/Q), a modest NIM improvement (3.53% Q2) and strong loan and deposit growth, while efficiency has improved as revenue growth outpaced operating expenses. Management highlights ample liquidity and capital (well above “well-capitalized” thresholds) but calls out concentration in Northern California, commercial real estate exposure, sensitivity to interest rates, and a sizeable upcoming time-deposit maturity profile (~$768M over 12 months, including $366M brokered). Those operational and balance-sheet characteristics will be the primary drivers of near-term performance and investor scrutiny.
Given FSBC’s business model and the MDA metrics, incentive pay for senior bankers is likely tied closely to net interest income, loan growth, NIM, efficiency ratio and credit quality (e.g., non‑accruals, ACL and net charge-offs). Typical structures in regional banking combine fixed salary with annual cash bonuses linked to financial/operational targets and longer‑term equity or performance units that vest based on multi‑year ROA/ROE and risk‑adjusted outcomes; deferrals, clawbacks and risk adjustments are common to align incentives with asset quality. The recent investments in staff, technology and digital platforms—plus increases in FDIC assessments—mean some compensation scorecards may include non‑interest expense or productivity metrics. Regulators’ guidance on sound incentive compensation and the bank’s capital position (and potential dividend/share actions) will also influence the design and timing of payouts.
Insiders at FSBC will routinely generate reportable activity tied to equity awards vesting, 10b5‑1 plans and dividend dates (management declared a $0.20/share cash dividend), and such predictable events often explain clustered Form 4 filings. Because bank executives are subject to Section 16 reporting and intense regulatory oversight, many use pre‑arranged trading plans and observe blackout periods around quarter close and material deposit/liquidity developments. The company’s concentration in Northern California, CRE exposure and a large upcoming time‑deposit maturity profile raise event risk that could prompt opportunistic insider buys (to signal confidence) or sales (to diversify) depending on management views of liquidity and asset quality. Finally, incentive compensation deferrals and potential clawbacks tied to later credit deterioration mean that large immediate insider sales following strong quarters may warrant closer scrutiny.