Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
0 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is an externally managed, closed-end Business Development Company (BDC) and regulated investment company that targets U.S. lower‑middle‑market companies (generally EBITDA $4–$15M). The firm primarily originates senior‑secured and subordinated debt (targeting roughly a 75% debt / 25% equity portfolio mix) and complementary equity interests to generate current income and long‑term capital appreciation; as of Q1 2025 the portfolio was ~$979M across 25 companies with meaningful concentration in a few large holdings. Operations are run by an affiliated Adviser/Administrator (Gladstone) under an advisory agreement; GAIN itself has no direct employees and relies on affiliate staff for day‑to‑day management. Key business sensitivities include variable‑rate SOFR loans, off‑balance contractual success fees, portfolio concentration, non‑accrual exposure, and valuation subjectivity that materially affect NAV and reported results.
Because GAIN is externally managed, executive compensation flows largely through the affiliated Adviser rather than as payroll on GAIN’s standalone roster; the Adviser earns a 2.0% base management fee plus income‑ and capital‑gain‑based incentive fees. That fee mix means compensation is directly driven by three company metrics: yield/interest income on the loan book (current income), realizations/exit gains (capital gains and success fees), and fair‑value appraisals (which determine capital‑gain incentive accruals). The Adviser also receives fee credits for third‑party costs and loan servicing, which can affect net incentive payouts; valuation subjectivity under Rule 2a‑5 and timing of contingent success fees (off‑balance until realized) create variability in incentive compensation. Typical for the Financial Services / Asset Management industry, this structure aligns manager pay with income generation and realized exits but creates potential conflicts over valuation and timing of realized gains.
Insiders and affiliated managers at GAIN have access to material nonpublic information that meaningfully affects NAV and future incentive fees—examples include the magnitude/timing of contractual success fees, status of large concentrated holdings (one holding ≈10% of the portfolio), and the health of non‑accrual loans. That information tends to produce predictable trading triggers: insider trades often cluster before/after large realizations or restructurings, around ATM equity issuances and debt offerings, and near public NAV/earnings disclosures; blackout windows and Form 4/Section 16 rules (short‑swing profit exposure for officers/directors/10% holders) are therefore material constraints. Given the external management and related‑party arrangements, watch valuation committee disclosures and incentive‑fee reversals in filings—these items frequently explain sudden insider sales/purchases and are useful signals for traders monitoring GAIN in the Financial Services / Asset Management space.