Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
44 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Great Elm Capital Corp. is an externally managed, closed-end Business Development Company (BDC) that seeks current income and capital appreciation by investing across the credit spectrum of U.S. middle‑market companies and in specialty finance platforms. Principal holdings include secured and mezzanine loans, equity/equity‑linked securities, participation interests in specialty finance originators/servicers, and a 71.25% interest in a CLO Formation JV; the firm also owns ~87.5% of Great Elm Specialty Finance, LLC. The company is externally managed by Great Elm Capital Management (GECM) and has no employees; its portfolio grew to ~$324M by year‑end 2024 and to ~$335M mid‑2025, with meaningful variable‑rate exposure (~$179.8M) and an asset coverage ratio near ~170%.
Compensation is driven primarily by the external management agreements: a base management fee of 1.50% on adjusted gross assets and performance/incentive fees (quarterly income‑based fees with a 1.75% quarterly hurdle and a 20% capital‑gains fee subject to lookback rules). That structure produced $4.5M of base fees and $2.6M of income‑based fees in 2024, so executives’ economic rewards scale with AUM growth and income generation rather than headcount or operating margin. Given the BDC model and GECM’s ownership of specialty finance assets (e.g., the CLO JV and GESF), incentives naturally favor portfolio growth, higher-yield originations and fee‑producing transactions—behaviors that can increase risk-taking in illiquid or structured positions when chasing incentive payouts. Standard asset‑management norms apply (mix of fixed fees + performance fees, potential carried‑interest-like economics), but BDC/RIC tax tests and Investment Company Act constraints mean pay outcomes are sensitive to distributions, realized income, and valuation methodologies.
Insider trading patterns at Great Elm are likely to reflect timing around portfolio valuations, distribution declarations, CLO dividends and note issuances—events that materially affect NAV and reported investment income. Because the company is externally managed, insiders who trade are often principals or employees of GECM or related affiliates; watch Form 4 filings for activity by those individuals and for any related‑party transactions tied to the CLO JV or GESF. Illiquid and mark‑to‑market‑sensitive positions (e.g., CLO equity, specialty finance credits) can produce large NAV swings, so insider buys may signal management confidence in pricing/credit remediation while sells may be liquidity- or compensation-driven; traders should monitor incentive‑fee quarters, blackout policies, and 10‑Q/10‑K valuation disclosures for context. Regulatory factors—Investment Company Act provisions, RIC distribution rules and public reporting requirements—create disclosure and governance checks that can limit certain affiliated trades but also make timely, public NAV and distribution notices key catalysts for market moves.