Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
207 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Gilead Sciences is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on virology (notably HIV and liver disease antivirals), oncology (including CAR‑T and antibody–drug conjugates) and inflammation, commercializing leading HIV regimens (Biktarvy, Genvoya, Descovy), liver antivirals, oncology drugs (Trodelvy, Yescarta) and hospital/infectious disease products. The company uses a hybrid commercial model with direct sales and heavy reliance on three U.S. wholesalers (Cardinal, Cencora, McKesson) and a mix of owned manufacturing sites plus extensive contract manufacturing. In 2024 Gilead generated $28.8B in revenue (HIV and oncology growth) but reported materially lower net income due to large non‑cash IPR&D impairments and acquisition-related charges; operating cash flow remained strong and management is balancing R&D investment with dividends and buybacks. The business is highly regulated (FDA/EMA, cGMP, pricing/reimbursement) and faces concentration, patent/exclusivity and reimbursement risks that drive near‑term financial volatility.
Compensation at Gilead is likely driven by product sales growth (HIV, oncology), product gross margin and cash flow metrics, plus milestone and regulatory outcomes for late‑stage programs — typical pharma levers that management cites in MD&A. Given the 2024 impairments and acquisition charges, annual bonus and incentive plans will commonly use adjusted (non‑GAAP) EBITDA/EPS or revenue‑and‑pipeline KPIs to smooth the impact of one‑time IPR&D write‑downs; long‑term incentives are likely equity‑heavy (PRSUs, options) and include performance vesting tied to regulatory approvals, clinical milestones and total shareholder return. Acquisition activity and retention needs (e.g., CymaBay, partnership deals) make sign‑on awards and retention grants more likely, while steady dividends and opportunistic buybacks mean executives’ realized pay is sensitive to capital allocation decisions that support stock price. Pay governance will also reflect pharmaceutical norms: clawback provisions, stock ownership guidelines and potential use of milestone carve‑outs for M&A and licensing outcomes.
Insider trading activity at Gilead will often cluster around clearly material events: clinical trial readouts, FDA/EMA decisions or labeling changes (lenacapavir, CAR‑T data, Trodelvy updates), quarterly earnings that reveal the effect of wholesaler inventory patterns, and major M&A or impairment announcements. Because Gilead routinely records large non‑cash IPR&D impairments and makes acquisitions, insiders may time diversification or tax‑driven sales after grant vesting, post‑earnings windows, or under Rule 10b5‑1 plans; conversely, insider purchases around approvals or positive data can be a strong signal. The sector’s regulatory sensitivity (trial holds, reimbursement reforms such as Medicare Part D changes) increases the legal and reputational risk of trading on material non‑public information, so look for strict blackout periods, public 10b5‑1 disclosures and filings (Form 4) following major clinical or regulatory milestones.