Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
13 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Greenwich Lifesciences (GLSI) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical developer focused on GLSI-100 (GP2 peptide + GM‑CSF), an active immunotherapy aimed at preventing recurrence in HER2/neu‑expressing breast cancer. Its lead Flamingo‑01 program is a randomized Phase III trial (global PI: Baylor College of Medicine) that is expanding into Europe with plans for up to ~150 global sites; prior Phase I/II work showed tolerability and encouraging signals in HER2 3+ patients. The company is very small and development‑centric (only a few full‑ and part‑time employees), has no internal manufacturing, relies on third‑party contractors and a single GM‑CSF supplier, holds exclusively licensed IP from the Henry M. Jackson Foundation with milestone/royalty obligations, and currently generates no product revenue while burning cash to fund the Phase III.
Compensation appears heavily weighted to equity and option grants rather than cash, consistent with the company’s emerging‑growth, clinical‑stage profile: management disclosed a one‑time upfront vesting (25% of an options grant) that materially increased G&A and non‑cash stock‑based compensation expense. Given the binary, milestone‑driven nature of the business (site expansion, enrollment progress, interim analysis, BLA/approval milestones), long‑term incentives are likely structured around clinical and regulatory milestones and retention for a very small team; base salaries are typically modest and equity used to align executives with trial outcomes. Contingent license milestone and royalty obligations (to HJF) and limited cash runway increase pressure to use equity as a primary retention and performance tool, which can lead to larger discrete stock grants or accelerated vesting to retain staff as trial demands increase.
As a small, thinly traded biotech with a low float and frequent ATM financings, insider transactions can have outsized market impact and be interpreted as signaling—especially around enrollment updates, interim analyses, trial site expansions, or new financings. Executives and directors are likely Section 16 insiders required to file Form 4s within two business days; common controls include blackout periods around material non‑public clinical data and use of pre‑planned 10b5‑1 trading plans to avoid appearance of trading on inside information. Practical drivers of insider sales here include liquidity needs to cover option exercises or tax liabilities following large vesting events, participation in financing rounds/ATMs, and routine diversification, but these actions should be scrutinized for timing relative to clinical milestones and ATM issuance windows. Regulatory and perception risk is elevated in this sector—any insider activity near material trial news can trigger investor scrutiny and SEC attention, so documentation of trading plans and compliance with blackout rules is especially important.