Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
0 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Greenpro Capital Corp. is a Nevada‑incorporated holding company that provides bundled cross‑border business solutions, accounting outsourcing and corporate advisory services across Southeast and East Asia, with operations concentrated in Hong Kong, China and Malaysia and regional offices in Kuala Lumpur and Shenzhen. Its offerings span company formation, tax and payroll services, transaction and listing advisory, family office and insurance brokerage, a venture capital arm and a Labuan‑licensed digital asset/STO platform (Green‑X) that includes Shariah‑compliant token issuance and custody arrangements. The company reported revenue of $3.50M in 2024 (digital revenue $327.8k), employed 48 people, and faces multi‑jurisdictional regulation, material related‑party exposures and an auditor going‑concern emphasis amid an accumulated deficit (~$37–38M) and tightening cash (≈$1.12M YE2024; $833k at 6/30/25).
Given Greenpro’s small scale, transaction‑driven advisory model and early‑stage digital business, executive pay is likely weighted toward variable, milestone‑based compensation tied to completed listings/advisory engagements, successful STO/token issuances, growth in digital revenue and cost control metrics (G&A and credit loss provisions). Cash pay is constrained by ongoing losses and liquidity stress, so retention and incentive packages commonly rely on equity, options, earnouts, carried interest from VC activities or token grants from Green‑X — structures that align pay with future financing, platform adoption and asset performance but raise valuation and accounting complexity. Compensation decisions will also be influenced by related‑party activity, the need to retain key cross‑border executives, and regulatory limits (Labuan securities rules and Shariah requirements) that can affect the design and timing of token or cash‑settled incentives.
GRNQ is a thinly traded, microcap company with limited liquidity and significant insider/related‑party balances (~$1.26M), so insider transactions can materially move the share price and merit close scrutiny for timing relative to financing, acquisition, or Green‑X regulatory milestones. Expect two pragmatic patterns: insider stock/token purchases as a confidence signal (especially given the going‑concern) and opportunistic sales by insiders needing liquidity — both can be complicated by PRC foreign‑exchange controls, Labuan licensing constraints, and potential lockups tied to cross‑border listings or STO allocations. Also monitor on‑chain token movements and disclosures for non‑traditional compensation monetization, and look for formal trading plans (e.g., 10b5‑1 or written board approvals) and board oversight where related‑party transactions intersect with executive pay.