Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
2 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Goldman Sachs BDC Inc (GSBD) is an externally managed, closed-end specialty finance firm that elected BDC and RIC treatment and primarily originates and holds direct loans to U.S. middle‑market companies. The portfolio is predominately secured, floating‑rate private credit (≈97.6% secured; ~99% of performing debt floating rate) with ~503 investments across 164 companies and a weighted‑average portfolio yield near the low double digits at fair value. Operations and day‑to‑day functions are provided by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) under an investment management agreement; the BDC itself has no employees and relies on GSAM’s origination and structuring capabilities. The business is highly sensitive to credit cycles, interest‑rate moves, NAV volatility and regulatory BDC/RIC constraints (asset‑coverage, affiliated transaction limits, and exemptions).
GSBD’s adviser is paid a 1.00% annual management fee on gross assets plus incentive fees tied to net investment income and realized capital gains, so advisory compensation is directly linked to portfolio yield, credit performance and exit outcomes. Because GSBD is externally managed, most “executive” economic incentives flow through GSAM’s compensation structure (portfolio and origination teams) rather than GSBD payroll, which concentrates pay risk in fees and incentive pools rather than salary. Recent filings note amended incentive‑fee terms (reduced post‑2024 rates) and quarter‑to‑quarter volatility in incentive fees (e.g., a material incentive fee in Q2 2025), highlighting sensitivity of pay to realized losses/gains, NAV swings and the timing of restructurings or exits. Typical industry levers—base management fees, performance fees, incentive fee caps, deferred or clawback provisions—are relevant here, and changes to leverage, asset coverage or dividend policy will materially affect incentive economics.
Insider trading patterns for GSBD will often track discrete credit events, NAV swings, distribution announcements and financing activity (ATMs, note issuances, repurchases) because these drive immediate valuation and income expectations; realized losses and non‑accrual trends are particularly market‑sensitive. Because GSBD is externally managed, meaningful insiders include GSAM portfolio managers and affiliated Goldman executives who are subject to Goldman’s internal trading controls, pre‑clearance rules and firmwide restricted lists—trades by those individuals may be slower to appear on Form 4s or influenced by firm compliance. Regulatory constraints unique to BDCs/RICs (asset‑coverage minimums, limits on affiliated transactions, and constrained hedging under Rule 18f‑4/CFTC rules) also limit the types of hedges insiders can use, making outright equity transactions more likely than sophisticated derivatives. Finally, recent leadership changes, amendments to the investment management agreement and large corporate actions (ATM activity, repurchases, note offerings) are periods when insider trades warrant closer scrutiny for information asymmetry.