Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
36 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Harrow, Inc. is an eyecare‑focused pharmaceutical company with two reportable segments: Branded (FDA‑approved ophthalmic drugs such as IHEEZO, VEVYE, TRIESENCE, etc.) and ImprimisRx (an ophthalmology‑focused compounding business supplying customized formulations to >10,000 U.S. prescribers). The company uses a hybrid manufacturing model (ImprimisRx finished goods from two NJ facilities, branded products manufactured by third parties globally) and holds minority equity/royalty stakes in clinical‑stage assets (Melt, Surface). Harrow reported a step‑change in 2024 revenue to $199.6M (branded $116.1M; ImprimisRx $83.5M) and narrowed net loss to $17.5M, but faces regulatory (FDA Form 483, voluntary recalls, evolving 503A/503B rules), reimbursement and refinancing risks (Oaktree loan $107.5M maturing Jan 2026 and $75M notes maturing in 2026).
Compensation is likely to combine market‑competitive base salaries with annual cash incentives tied to commercialization and commercial metrics (revenue, branded unit uptake, gross margin/EBITDA) and long‑term equity (PSUs, stock‑based awards) tied to strategic milestones and share performance — consistent with specialty drug manufacturers. Company specifics that will shape pay design include heavy commercialization spending (SG&A rose materially for launch hires), milestone‑driven obligations (e.g., TRIESENCE $37M payment), and recent PSUs that generated material payroll tax cash outflows—management disclosed $12.6M YTD financing outflows related to payroll taxes on vested PSUs. Given tight near‑term liquidity and refinancing risk, boards may shift toward performance‑contingent, deferred or equity‑heavy incentives, and include clawback/forfeiture provisions tied to regulatory compliance (FDA findings, recalls) and financial restatements.
Insiders at Harrow will often possess material information around product launches, reimbursement/access decisions (pass‑through status, 340B/Medicare dynamics), FDA inspection/remediation outcomes for the NJ 503B facility, and refinancing/loan negotiation status — all of which can materially affect valuation and are likely to drive clustered insider activity. The ImprimisRx business’s cash transactions and direct prescriber relationships can make sales/receivables shifts highly visible internally, so collections improvements or distributor payment extensions have potential to trigger insider buying/selling. Given meaningful debt maturing in early‑to‑mid‑2026 and potential dilution from refinancing or asset sales, expect heightened insider activity tied to debt negotiations and any public updates; standard Section 16 reporting, blackout periods around earnings and pending material regulatory announcements, and potential contractual pay restrictions under financing arrangements should be monitored.