Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
191 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Iron Mountain is a global information management REIT that provides end-to-end physical and digital services — records storage/destruction, digital conversion/workflow, secure shredding, ALM for IT hardware, and a growing Global Data Centers platform — to >240,000 customers in 61 countries. The business is asset‑intensive and largely recurring: ~1,350 locations, ~98 million square feet (≈24 million owned), >730 million cubic feet of physical volume, and a data center footprint with ~416 MW leasable capacity (≈96% leased). Management is executing a capital‑heavy growth strategy (2024 revenue $6.15B; Adjusted EBITDA $2.24B) that emphasizes cross‑sell of digital/ALM services, data center lease commencements, and a global operating transformation (Project Matterhorn) while funding ~ $1.95B capex in 2025 and managing significant long‑term debt.
Compensation is likely weighted to both REIT and enterprise‑services performance metrics: REIT‑typical measures such as FFO/AFFO per share and dividend sustainability, plus corporate metrics tied to Adjusted EBITDA, revenue growth (notably service/ALM and data center lease commencements), margin expansion, and cash flow/capital deployment. Given Iron Mountain’s heavy development and M&A posture, LTIP payouts will likely include equity‑based grants (RSUs/performance shares) tied to multi‑year targets (TSR, FFO growth, or EBITDA/cost‑savings from Project Matterhorn) and cash/bonus components tied to annual operating targets and covenant compliance (fixed charge coverage, leverage). Rising interest expense, high capex needs, and contingent acquisition liabilities mean compensation committees may place extra emphasis on leverage, cash conversion and integration milestones, and may include clawbacks or hold‑back provisions to protect against short‑term accounting or acquisition reversals.
Insiders will be constrained by standard Section 16/Form 4 reporting, blackout windows and likely 10b5‑1 plans, but trading patterns should be watched around material operational events: quarterly FFO/AFFO disclosures, dividend declarations, Project Matterhorn milestones/cost revisions, large data center lease commencements or power/energy announcements, and acquisition earn‑out triggers (e.g., Regency/Web Werks). Because routine equity grants and exercises are common in REITs, expect periodic insider sales to cover taxes; conversely, opportunistic insider buying can follow market dips driven by non‑operating items (FX losses, rising interest expense) rather than core operating weakness. Regulatory and sector specifics — REIT qualification rules, energy/power availability for data centers, environmental remediation exposures — can create material windows where insiders are likely to be restricted from trading.