Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
57 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Jaguar Health is a commercial-stage, plant-derived pharmaceutical company focused on gastrointestinal disorders in humans and animals, with marketed products Mytesi (crofelemer) and recently launched Gelclair, plus a conditionally approved veterinary product Canalevia‑CA1. The firm is small and lean (49 employees), relies on third‑party contract manufacturers and sustainably sourced Croton lechleri, and leverages a sizable ethnobotanical/IP estate and licensing partnerships for geographic reach. Financially it is revenue‑generating but unprofitable, with modest product sales, high operating losses, tight cash balances and material dependence on additional financings, partnership deals and regulatory milestones to fund ongoing R&D and commercialization.
Given Jaguar’s profile, executive pay at the company is likely heavily equity‑oriented (stock options/RSUs) with short‑ and long‑term incentives tied to regulatory and commercial milestones—e.g., trial readouts, FDA/EMA designations, launches (Gelclair) and product sales growth (Mytesi/Canalevia). Management’s MD&A emphasizes shifting R&D versus S&M spend and cash scarcity, so compensation plans likely emphasize milestone and performance pay (clinical progress, licensing deals, reimbursement wins) alongside retention awards to keep small, specialized scientific and commercial talent. Hybrid debt/equity financing, fair‑value accounting swings, and recurring ATMs increase dilution pressure and can compress realized equity value, so boards often balance cash bonuses or severance protections with long‑dated equity vesting to align incentives without worsening near‑term cash burn.
Jaguar’s small‑cap, thinly traded nature, frequent capital raises (ATMs, convertibles), and reliance on material clinical/regulatory events make insider transactions particularly informative but also risk‑laden: insider buys around clinical confidence are strong positive signals, while sales near financing announcements may reflect liquidity needs or option exercises rather than a judgment on fundamentals. Watch for Form 4 disclosures, the presence of Rule 10b5‑1 trading plans, and timing relative to FDA meetings, trial readouts or licensing deals—these are predictable blackout triggers where non‑preplanned trades are both restricted and more likely to attract regulatory scrutiny. Additionally, biotech regulatory and reimbursement uncertainties (e.g., IRA/Medicare Part D impacts) and patent expirations mean insider trading patterns can shift quickly as capital needs and commercial prospects evolve.