Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
18 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Karman Space and Defense (KRMN) designs, tests, manufactures and sells integrated mission‑critical systems for missile, hypersonic and space programs across three end markets—Hypersonics & Strategic Missile Defense, Tactical Missile & Integrated Defense Systems, and Space & Launch—each contributing roughly one‑third of 2024 revenue. The company runs a vertically integrated concept‑to‑production model (≈730k sq ft, ~1,113 employees, ~180 engineers) with proprietary IP (13 issued patents) and long, visible program tails that support multi‑year funded backlog (2024 funded backlog $579.8M; Q2 2025 backlog $719.3M). Financially it reported $345.3M revenue in 2024 (23% YoY), strong Adjusted EBITDA margins (~30%), but elevated leverage (total debt roughly $441M–$478M in 2024–H1 2025) and material weaknesses in internal controls; revenue is highly concentrated in U.S. government contracting (~77.7% of 2024 revenue) and subject to export‑control regimes (ITAR, AECA, EAR, OFAC).
Compensation is likely tied to program wins, funded backlog conversion, gross margin/Adjusted EBITDA and multi‑year delivery milestones given the long program durations and significant engineering content; management will favor multi‑year performance metrics over single‑quarter targets. Because growth has been driven by acquisitions (RMS, MTI, ISP) and rapid scaling, packages typically combine cash salary, cash bonuses tied to integration/cost‑control milestones, and equity (RSUs/PSUs) to retain engineers and align executives with long revenue tails and IP value. High leverage and sizable interest cost (~$50M net interest reported) will push board emphasis on cash‑generation and leverage metrics in incentive plans, while IPO‑era governance means larger equity grants but also stricter vesting/clawback language tied to control remediation and financial targets. Given the company’s reliance on contract performance and fixed‑price development work, expect performance adjustments for EAC (estimates‑at‑completion) and potential KPI collars for large program execution risk.
Insider trading patterns at Karman will be influenced by milestone timing and contract award news—both can create pronounced quarter‑to‑quarter volatility—so purchases or sales around backlog updates, major program milestones, or award announcements are especially informative. As a U.S. government contractor subject to export controls and sensitive procurement rules, executives and employees are likely subject to formal trading windows, pre‑clearance requirements and blackout periods (and may rely on 10b5‑1 plans for diversification); material weaknesses in internal control typically lead to tighter pre‑clearance and temporary restrictions. Watch insider sales for liquidity/diversification motives (post‑IPO unlocks or personal tax planning) versus signaling about execution or covenant stress given elevated debt and a springing revolver covenant; conversely, insider buys during program ramp‑ups or backlog upgrades can be a higher‑conviction signal because of the technical knowledge insiders hold.