Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
497 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is a technology-driven aerospace & defense company that designs, manufactures and fields jet-powered unmanned aerial systems, small turbojet/turbofan engines and rocket motors, hypersonic vehicles, microwave electronics, satellite ground systems, C5ISR/CUAS products and mixed/virtual training systems. It reports two operating segments—Kratos Government Solutions (KGS) and Unmanned Systems (US)—with ~4,000 employees, ~67% U.S. government revenue and a funded/funded+unfunded backlog around $1.4B. Management emphasizes internally funded R&D, multi-hundred-million dollar facility and production investments (jet engine plants, hypersonics campus), and a contract mix weighted toward fixed‑price work (≈69%), while flagging federal budget uncertainty, supply-chain and cleared‑personnel constraints as key operational risks.
Compensation at Kratos is likely driven by contract wins, backlog conversion, revenue growth, margin performance (product vs. service), and cash‑flow/capital structure metrics—particularly given recent compression in product margins and working-capital demands (DSO ~100+ days). As typical in Industrials/Aerospace & Defense, pay mixes include base salaries, annual cash incentives tied to financial and program milestones (award captures, margin/cost management, on‑time delivery), and long‑term equity (RSUs, performance shares) to retain cleared engineers and production leadership during multi‑year programs. Company‑specific drivers include IR&D spend, successful scaling of production capacity (jet engines, hypersonics), liquidity/covenant status (recent equity raises and debt paydown), and DCAA/FAR cost accounting outcomes—all of which can affect bonus payouts and vesting outcomes.
Kratos’ mix of classified work, program milestones and government funding cycles creates frequent material nonpublic events (award announcements, funded‑backlog recognition, appropriation/CRA developments) that can trigger blackout windows and heighten insider‑trading risk. Recent sizeable equity offerings (Feb 2024 and mid‑2025) materially increased float and cash on hand—events that often coincide with executive option exercises or planned sales to satisfy tax/portfolio needs, and that can produce observable selling patterns. Regulatory and contracting constraints (ITAR/CFIUS, DCAA audits, procurement confidentiality and CMMC cybersecurity rules) mean insiders with program visibility are typically subject to strict trading policies and are likely to use pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans; unusual timing (clustered sales around contract milestones or immediately after equity raises) is a useful flag for traders and researchers to monitor.