Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
206 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Leidos is a Reston, VA–based technology integrator focused on defense, intelligence and civil markets, delivering mission software, AI/cyber, health IT, air-traffic and classified systems across four reportable segments (National Security & Digital, Health & Civil, Commercial & International, Defense Systems). The company is heavily U.S. government‑centric (~87% of FY2024 revenues), with FY2024 revenue of $16.7B, operating income of $1.83B, and a sizable backlog (>$43B) that drives near‑term revenue visibility. Growth in FY2024 and recent quarters has been driven by program wins, improved execution and higher volumes, while the business remains exposed to federal budget timing, IDIQ/task‑order dynamics and program‑specific risks.
Compensation at Leidos is likely tied to program execution and company‑level financial metrics—revenue growth, operating margin/adjusted operating income, bookings and backlog growth, free cash flow and adjusted EPS—reflecting the firm’s project‑driven, government‑contracting model. Given the importance of retention for cleared and STEM talent (~52% cleared; ~37% STEM) the company likely uses a mix of cash bonuses, retention awards, RSUs/PSUs and long‑term equity linked to multi‑year performance (e.g., bookings and backlog or multi‑year margin targets) to align pay with contract wins and program delivery. Recent capital actions (≈$850M buybacks in FY2024; $500M accelerated buyback in 2025) and leverage changes after $1.0B senior notes issuance mean executives’ incentive plans may also incorporate capital‑allocation goals (shareholder returns, debt metrics, and liquidity/covenant compliance). Finally, as a major federal contractor, Leidos’ incentive pay design and allowability of contractor costs are influenced by CAS/FAR cost‑allowability rules and government scrutiny of executive compensation.
Insider trading at Leidos is likely to cluster around discrete, material events that change revenue visibility—IDIQ/task‑order awards, major contract wins or losses, backlog restatements, M&A (e.g., Kudu Dynamics), and quarterly earnings tied to program execution and federal appropriations. Executives and directors are typically constrained by blackout windows, pre‑clearance policies and frequent use of Rule 10b5‑1 plans to manage planned sales; in addition, access to classified program information can impose stricter internal restrictions on trading timing. Watch for insider sales that coincide with share‑repurchase programs or follow RSU/PSU vesting schedules (common in tech/defense), and monitor Section 16 filings for sales that deviate from typical patterns—large, unplanned dispositions ahead of contract announcements or appropriations developments may be informative to traders and researchers.