Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
106 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Lincoln National Corporation is a diversified life-insurance holding company operating four principal businesses: Annuities, Life Insurance, Group Protection and Retirement Plan Services. Its product mix includes variable, fixed and RILA annuities (with guaranteed benefit riders), multiple life products (universal, indexed and variable), group disability and supplemental benefits, and recordkeeping/defined-contribution retirement solutions distributed through a mix of internal wholesalers and external intermediaries. The company’s economics combine underwriting margins, investment spreads on general account assets, fee income and hedging/derivative programs to manage market-linked guarantees; key recent actions include the 2024 sale of its retail wealth distributor, creation and capitalization of a Bermuda reinsurer (LPINE), and active reinsurance and balance-sheet management. Profitability and capital are highly sensitive to interest rates, equity volatility, persistency/mortality, and the effectiveness of hedging programs, and management emphasizes adjusted/operating measures to smooth mark-to-market volatility.
Given Lincoln’s business model and the MD&A emphasis on “operating” results, incentive pay is likely weighted toward adjusted operating earnings and segment operating income (Annuities, Group Protection, Retirement) rather than raw GAAP net income, because GAAP is materially affected by fair-value swings in annuity product features and hedge marks. Long-term incentives for senior executives are likely structured around risk-adjusted financial metrics—ROE/ROTC, new-business economics (e.g., APE or new sales margins), persistency/lapse metrics, expense ratios, and capital measures such as RBC or dividend capacity—and may include performance shares, restricted stock, and multi-year vesting tied to capital-management outcomes (reinsurance transactions, subsidiary dividends, and debt metrics). Compensation programs in this sector typically include gating provisions (bonus forfeiture/clawbacks) tied to solvency/rating outcomes and explicit limits when regulatory or rating triggers are breached; Lincoln’s recent capital actions (LPINE, affiliate reinsurance, wealth-sale proceeds) would materially affect bonus pools and long‑term payout outcomes. Because actuarial assumption reviews and hedge effectiveness produce volatile, material impacts, the company likely uses normalized or adjusted metrics and may defer or smooth incentives to align pay with long-term economic value.
Insider trading at Lincoln should be viewed through the lens of large, recurring non-cash valuation swings (annuity rider fair values and MRB/hedge marks), frequent capital transactions (reinsurance placements, subsidiary dividends, debt issuances, large asset sales), and periodic comprehensive actuarial reviews (noted as Q3 annually) that can be material. Expect formal blackout periods around earnings releases, actuarial/assumption reviews, and major capital transactions, and widespread use of 10b5-1 plans by executives to pre-schedule trades given the company’s earnings volatility and seasonality (sales skew to Q4). Regulatory and rating-sensitive constraints (state insurance dividend limitations, NAIC initiatives, and covenants tied to ratings) also create windows when executives are practically prevented from monetizing equity gains; conversely, insiders may opportunistically use permitted windows after public transactions (e.g., the wealth-sale or capital injections) to rebalance concentrated positions — such trades will often be monitored closely by investors. Finally, Section 16 reporting timeliness and company disclosure of compensation/transaction policies are important signals for traders assessing whether an insider sell/buy reflects diversification, liquidity needs, or informational advantages.