Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
49 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Alliant Energy is a regulated, investor‑owned utility holding company serving roughly 1.0 million electric and 430,000 gas customers in the Midwest through Interstate Power & Light (IPL) and Wisconsin Power & Light (WPL). Its generation portfolio includes coal, natural gas, wind and solar, supplemented by PPAs and MISO market purchases, and the company is pursuing a multi‑year shift toward renewables, storage and selective gas conversions while managing coal retirements. Alliant’s business model depends on regulated cost‑recovery (retail rate cases, riders, fuel pass‑throughs), significant capital spending (multi‑billion dollar program focused on renewables/storage/gas), and exposure to regulatory outcomes (FERC, IUB, PSCW) and EPA rulemaking. Seasonal load patterns, MISO resource adequacy changes, fuel procurement and renewable tax‑credit transferability (IRA impacts) are material operational drivers called out in recent filings.
Compensation at Alliant is likely oriented around regulated‑utility norms: fixed base pay plus annual and long‑term incentive pay tied to financial and operational metrics such as rate base growth, allowed return on equity or regulated earnings measures, operating cash flow and EPS, as well as safety, reliability and customer service metrics. Given the filings’ emphasis on large capital programs and project execution risk, a meaningful portion of incentive pay is expected to be linked to capital project milestones (renewables/storage builds), cost control, regulatory approvals and timely in‑service dates that drive revenue requirement increases. Recent items highlighted in the MD&A — ARO additions, impairment charges (Lansing), and the benefit from renewable tax‑credit transfers — suggest the board may also consider non‑GAAP/cash metrics (cash flow, tax‑credit monetization) when setting short‑term bonuses and long‑term performance units. Traditional retirement and benefits (pension/OPEB), dividend policy (management announced a target 6% dividend increase), and succession/retention needs in a unionized, capital‑intensive utility will also shape total‑rewards design.
Insider trading patterns at Alliant will often cluster around clear regulatory and capital‑market catalysts: rate case outcomes, major project approvals/permits, EPA or state rule changes, announcements on renewable tax‑credit transferability and large customer load wins (e.g., data center agreements). Because much value is realized through regulatory recoveries and cash‑flow timing, material nonpublic information on expected rate base additions, tax‑credit transfers or debt/equity financings can materially affect equity value — so insiders are likely to use blackout windows, pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans and standard policies to mitigate insider trading risk. State utility regulation and public scrutiny increase the reputational and legal sensitivity of trades around filings and regulatory decisions, and routine equity vesting or option exercises (to cover tax withholding) may explain some recurring insider sales absent other news.