Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
4 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) is a publicly traded, closed‑end business development company (BDC) and registered investment company (RIC) that originates and acquires debt investments in U.S. middle‑market companies. The portfolio is concentrated in directly originated, privately negotiated first‑lien senior secured and other floating‑rate middle‑market loans (99% floating‑rate lending; ~93% of fair value in secured debt), with ~96–97% of assets fair‑valued as Level 3. MFIC is externally managed and administered by Apollo affiliates (AIM/AIA), has no employees, and generates revenue principally from interest income, with active use of leverage, CLOs and securitizations to fund deployment.
Because MFIC is externally managed, executive compensation is driven primarily by the adviser’s fee economics rather than direct employee payroll: a base management fee (1.75% of NAV annualized) plus incentive/performance fees split into income and capital‑gains components (2024 base fees ~$19.45M and incentive fees ~$21.55M). Key performance drivers for adviser compensation are NAV, net investment income (NII), realized and unrealized gains/losses, portfolio yield and deployment activity (MFIC deployed $1.6B in 2024), and leverage/cost of debt metrics that affect net returns. The adviser’s role as valuation designee under Rule 2a‑5 and the high proportion of Level‑3 assets mean valuation judgments materially affect incentive fee calculations, creating potential incentives to manage mark levels and timing of realizations; co‑investment allocation policies and recent SEC exemptive relief also tie adviser economics to affiliate deal flow.
Insider trading activity will likely be concentrated among independent directors, company officers, and Apollo/AIM/AIA affiliates (the adviser and its personnel), with Form 4 reporting and Section 16 obligations applying to company insiders and large shareholders. Trading patterns may cluster around material events that affect NAV and distributable income—mergers/accretive portfolio additions (AFT/AIF), CLO and note financings, large realizations or restructurings (recent write‑offs), changes in PIK accruals, and shifts in leverage or credit conditions. Given the heavy Level‑3 valuation exposure, insiders with access to portfolio marks or diligence may have material non‑public information; expect standard blackout windows, Rule 10b5‑1 plans among officers/directors, and heightened scrutiny of trades by adviser affiliates when co‑investment allocations or valuation policies change. Regulatory constraints under the Investment Company Act of 1940, RIC distribution rules and recent SEC oversight of valuation/co‑investment practices can further limit or shape timing and permissibility of insider transactions.