Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
66 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Molina Healthcare is a Fortune 500, government‑sponsored managed care company focused on Medicaid, Medicare (including MAPD and dual‑eligible products) and ACA Marketplace plans, serving roughly 5.5–5.7 million members across ~21 states. Revenue is driven by per‑member‑per‑month (PMPM) government premiums—2024 premium revenue was ~$38.6B and total revenue ~$40.7B—with Medicaid as the dominant segment (~79% of premium revenue). Recent inorganic growth (Bright Health Medicare Jan 2024; ConnectiCare Feb 2025) and high RFP win rates underpin management’s expectation of substantial premium/membership growth through 2028. Material operational and financial sensitivities include heavy state/CMS regulation, RADV/risk‑adjustment audits, Medicaid redeterminations, concentrated state contracts, and seasonality from enrollment windows.
Given Molina’s business model, incentive pay is likely heavily tied to membership growth, premium revenue and adjusted financial metrics (adjusted EPS, operating margin, and medical care ratio/MCR targets) as well as non‑financial KPIs such as RFP win rates, membership retention, NCQA/quality scores, and successful M&A integration. Because reported results can be volatile due to RADV adjustments, claims reserve estimation, and acquisition accounting, compensation plans in this sector commonly use adjusted or normalized metrics (core operating margin, cash from operations, or multi‑year cumulative targets) and exclude one‑time acquisition or reserve movements. Long‑term equity awards typically vest on multi‑year performance (growth in premium or membership, ROIC, or cumulative adjusted earnings) and include stock ownership guidelines to align executives with shareholders. Credit rating, statutory capital limits and liquidity needs (notably recent borrowings, share repurchases and parent cash funding of acquisitions) can constrain discretionary payouts, accelerate use of equity over cash, or trigger clawback/forfeiture provisions tied to regulatory or False Claims Act outcomes.
Insider trading at Molina is likely to cluster around material inflection points that are company‑specific: state RFP award announcements and reprocurements, enrollment/redetermination milestones, RADV audit and settlement outcomes, quarterly earnings and acquisition closings. Expect executives to use pre‑planned 10b5‑1 programs for routine diversification given frequent M&A and repurchase activity; look for filings that coincide with the company’s repurchase authorizations ($1B programs) and parent cash swings after acquisitions. Regulatory and procurement processes create meaningful windows of material nonpublic information—blackout periods and strict insider rules are common—so sudden insider purchases (buys) near contract wins or after adverse regulatory headlines can be strong signals, while sales may be driven by tax/diversification needs or liquidity constraints rather than negative views on fundamentals. Finally, because Molina operates in a highly regulated environment with False Claims Act exposure and retroactive premium adjustments, researchers should monitor compensation clawbacks, Form 4s for clustered sales, and any executive option exercises disclosed near major regulatory or audit events.