Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
10 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is an externally managed, closed-end Business Development Company (BDC) and RIC that primarily originates and invests in senior-secured and other debt of U.S. middle‑market companies. Its adviser-managed portfolio is large and floating‑rate biased (portfolio fair value grew from ~$13.2B at 12/31/24 to ~$16.9B by 6/30/25 after a January 2025 merger), concentrated in first‑lien debt and sectors like internet software & services and insurance. The company has no employees and relies on Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC for sourcing, diligence, portfolio monitoring and workout activity, while funding is provided through revolving facilities, CLOs, SPVs and unsecured notes. Key operational constraints include 1940 Act asset‑coverage/leverage rules, RIC distribution requirements, and SEC exemptive relief that governs co‑investing and allocation among affiliated vehicles.
Because OBDC is externally managed, “executive compensation” primarily flows through the adviser via management fees and performance/incentive fees rather than payroll at the BDC itself; management and incentive fees rise with adjusted gross assets and net investment income, so scale events (e.g., the OBDE merger) directly increase fee income. Compensation for adviser personnel is likely driven by AUM growth, NII, realized/realizable returns on loan and equity positions, underwriting/credit performance (non‑accruals, recoveries), and successful CLO/SPV financing activity; carried interest or co‑investment allocations can also be material retention/aligning mechanisms. Significant fair‑value discretion (extensive Level‑3 inputs) and accounting judgments (PIK interest, accrual vs. non‑accrual treatment) mean incentive payouts can be sensitive to marks and NAV timing, creating potential volatility in realized compensation. Regulatory constraints (asset coverage targets, distribution obligations, and limits on affiliated transactions) and financing cost dynamics (interest expense, leverage targets) will also shape fee economics and incentive structure.
Insider trading patterns for OBDC are likely tied to discrete liquidity and valuation events—mergers/acquisitions, CLO issuances/redemptions, large repayments/prepayments, portfolio markdowns, distribution declarations, and repurchase program announcements—that materially move NAV or reported NII. Because adviser personnel and certain directors may have co‑investment and carry interests, monitor Forms 4/13D/G for trades by affiliated adviser professionals as well as directors/officers; valuation-driven incentive timing and Level‑3 mark volatility can produce clustered insider activity around quarter/year‑end reporting. Regulatory considerations include Section 16 reporting obligations, 1940 Act restrictions on affiliated transactions, and heightened SEC scrutiny of allocation/co‑investment practices (recent exemptive relief means allocation disclosures are especially relevant). Typical controls to watch for are use of blackout windows around earnings/M&A, adoption of 10b5‑1 plans by insiders, and public disclosures tied to repurchase programs or large financing events.