Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
0 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ) is a closed‑end, non‑diversified Business Development Company (BDC) that invests primarily in middle‑market private credit and structured finance — chiefly senior secured notes and CLO equity positions. As of year‑end 2024 the portfolio was roughly $261M with ~57.8% in senior secured notes and ~40.1% in CLO equity; the firm uses moderate leverage (asset coverage ~227%–235%) and raises capital via unsecured notes, ATM equity programs and occasional underwritten offerings. Operations and investment decisions are outsourced to Oxford Square Management (an external adviser), so OXSQ has no employees and relies heavily on the adviser’s personnel, sourcing network and board valuation processes. Key business drivers and risks are credit cycle dynamics, CLO pricing/valuation subjectivity (Level 3 inputs), liquidity of below‑investment‑grade holdings, and access to capital markets.
Because OXSQ is externally managed, executive/economic compensation flows primarily through Oxford Square Management’s fee arrangements rather than traditional employee payroll at the BDC; OXSQ pays base advisory fees plus incentive/adformance‑based fees (subject to fee‑waiver arrangements). Incentive alignment therefore depends on metrics captured in those fees — principally net investment income, realized/unrealized gains (NAV), portfolio yield and distributions — and management’s incentive design can influence risk allocation (e.g., greater tilt to higher‑volatility CLO equity or use of leverage to enhance returns). The company’s reported absence of Net Investment Income incentive fees in 2024 materially reduced operating expenses, illustrating how fee waivers change reported profitability and effective pay to adviser personnel. Board/director compensation is typically modest for BDCs, but material economic upside for adviser principals comes from performance fees and any carried interest or side arrangements; valuation subjectivity (Level 3) makes incentive fee calculation sensitive to accounting judgments.
Insiders (directors and beneficial officers, and key adviser personnel) likely possess material nonpublic information about restructurings, CLO distributions, realizations and Level‑3 valuations — areas that drove large realized losses and NAV swings in 2024–2025 — so trading windows, blackout policies and the use of 10b5‑1 plans are particularly important. As a registered fund/BDC, OXSQ insiders are subject to Exchange Act reporting (Forms 3/4/5) and Section 16 short‑swing profit rules, and trades around ATM equity programs, debt offerings (e.g., 6.25% note redemptions and the 7.75% note offering), distribution declarations and quarterly NAV disclosures merit particular scrutiny. Because the adviser earns fees tied to portfolio performance, watch for potential conflicts of interest (preferential allocations, timing of sales or restructurings) and for insider activity coincident with capital raises or material revaluations; insider buys when NAV is depressed can be a constructive signal, while clustered sales near ATM/debt events may signal liquidity needs or differing views on valuation.