Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
63 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
PagerDuty is a cloud‑first software company that sells the PagerDuty Operations Cloud — an incident management, AIOps, automation, customer service operations and generative‑AI platform — primarily via subscription and usage pricing. The company serves ~15,000 paying customers (including roughly half the Fortune 500), reported FY25 revenue of $467.5M, ARR approaching $499M, gross margin ~83%, and improving free cash flow and non‑GAAP profitability. PagerDuty’s go‑to‑market is a land‑and‑expand model that emphasizes enterprise upsells and usage growth (AIOps/AI consumption) alongside self‑service adoption for smaller customers. Key operational levers include R&D investment in AI and integrations, sales success in >$100k ARR accounts, and progress on regulated certifications such as FedRAMP.
Given PagerDuty’s SaaS model and the filing disclosures, executive pay is likely tied to a mix of recurring‑revenue and profitability metrics — ARR growth, dollar‑based net retention (DBNR), customer expansion (especially $100k+ accounts), churn, gross margin and free cash flow — plus strategic milestones like AI product adoption and FedRAMP progress. The company capitalizes sales commissions and amortizes them over an estimated four‑year benefit period, which implies multi‑year incentive alignment for sales leaders and makes multi‑year ARR and retention sensible performance targets for cash bonuses and long‑dated equity. Equity compensation appears material but has been managed down recently (reduced stock‑based comp mentioned), and performance/market‑based PSUs (valued via Monte Carlo) are used to link long‑term pay to stock performance and strategic execution. Share repurchase programs ($100M completed; larger authorizations announced) and improving FCF can shift compensation mix toward cash incentives or smaller equity grants to limit dilution.
Insider trading by executives and directors should be viewed against several company‑specific signals: timing of quarterly ARR/DBNR disclosures, material enterprise contract wins or losses, FedRAMP or other regulatory progress, and announcements about AI product launches or consumption pricing. Repurchase program announcements and debt repayments (repayment of convertible notes reduced debt from FY25 levels) can alter perceptions of intrinsic value and often coincide with opportunistic insider selling or planned purchases; check for 10b5‑1 plans and Section 16 filings around those events. Seasonal procurement cycles (Q1 typically weakest) and the company’s reliance on enterprise expansion create predictable blackout periods and event‑sensitive windows when insiders are more likely to be restricted or to use pre‑planned trading arrangements. Finally, given the technology sector’s data‑privacy and security sensitivities, material nonpublic information about customer incidents or regulatory approvals can create heightened insider‑trading risk and tighter internal trading controls.