Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
63 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) is a vertically integrated North American packaging and paper company — the third-largest containerboard producer and a leading uncoated freesheet (UFS) paper maker. PCA produces containerboard at eight mills and converts it into corrugated products at 86 plants, serving ~13,000 U.S. customers with a regional logistics focus (typical plant market radius ~150 miles). In 2024 PCA produced ~294 billion square feet of containerboard, shipped ~67 BSF of corrugated products, and reported $8.38 billion of net sales and ~$1.63 billion of consolidated EBITDA while running a capital-intensive program (2024 capex ~$670M; 2025 guidance $840–$870M) and pursuing the $1.8B Greif containerboard acquisition.
Given PCA’s operating model and recent disclosures, executive pay is likely driven by core operational metrics such as adjusted EBITDA, operating income for Packaging, containerboard and corrugated shipment volumes, price/mix, free cash flow and return on invested capital — especially because volumes and margin recovery have underpinned recent earnings. Long-term incentives typically reflect industry norms (time‑vested RSUs and performance awards tied to multi‑year financial goals and relative TSR or ROIC) to align pay with capex recovery, integration success on acquisitions (e.g., Greif), and sustained cost control (fiber, energy, freight). Compensation design will also reflect industry workforce dynamics (highly unionized hourly base, key plant-level retention), pension and environmental liability sensitivities, and may include clawbacks/recoupment and limits on hedging to protect shareholder alignment and regulatory compliance.
Material operational drivers (major outages, union contract negotiations, rail/freight changes, EPA/regulatory developments, large M&A milestones like the Greif deal) create frequent windows of material nonpublic information and likely produce strict blackout windows for insiders; 10b5‑1 trading plans are common for predictable sales tied to RSU vesting or tax liabilities. Because a meaningful portion of executive pay is likely equity‑based and vesting events occur quarterly/annually, routine insider sales to cover tax or diversification are likely, but significant purchases or sales around Q‑results, integration milestones, or capex guidance changes may be especially informative. Regulatory and disclosure risks (SEC rules, environmental/pension sensitivities and any tax/regulatory changes affecting deductibility) increase the importance of formal insider-trading policies and timely Form 4 filings for market observers.